William Sit wrote:
> Tim:
>
> Could you please re-verify the NAG version?
>
> According to your report, NAG version already has the
> problem for factoring 119646463, which is a prime (so in
> this case, 'factor' is correct and 'prime?' is wrong,
> according to your report for NAG). Also, my W
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 05:00:12 -0500
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
NAG MAY18/05DEC14/06
f:=119646463 f:=119646463
f:=119646463
factor f => 119646463factor f => 119646463 factor f
=> 119646463
prime? f => falseprime? f =>
Tim:
Could you please re-verify the NAG version?
According to your report, NAG version already has the
problem for factoring 119646463, which is a prime (so in
this case, 'factor' is correct and 'prime?' is wrong,
according to your report for NAG). Also, my Windows
version reports prime? 119
