> wh-sandbox has implemented a radically different algebra build
> process that avoids many of the problems associated with the
> old "bootstrap" method. It has also implemented some significant
> improvements to the way the Axiom database is built. Therefore
> it is not clear to me if it would be
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, IIUC Martin's package needs various algebra fixes.
I don't know what IIUC means, but I think I should comment:
YES.
My latest version (which guesses things of the form
binomial(a+b*n,n)*r(n),
r a rational function,
also needs the fix for iib
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | > I can do that. But then we cannot duplicate a directory like
> | > last time or we are going to have the disk space problem again.
> | > But should /trunk be removed first?
> |
> | I think we should *first* merg
Bill Page wrote:
> wh-sandbox has implemented a radically different algebra build
> process that avoids many of the problems associated with the
> old "bootstrap" method. It has also implemented some significant
> improvements to the way the Axiom database is built. Therefore
> it is not clear to m
On March 21, 2007 12:40 PM Gaby wrote:
>
> "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | I think we should *first* merge build-improvements and
> | wh-sandbox to define a new "Silver" /trunk at SourceForge.
> | Delete the old /silver branch as SourceForge.
>
> If we all agree on tha
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > I can do that. But then we cannot duplicate a directory like
| > last time or we are going to have the disk space problem again.
| > But should /trunk be removed first?
|
| I think we should *first* merge build-improvements and wh-sandbox
| to d
On March 20, 2007 3:01 PM Alfredo Portes
>
> On 3/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > By the way, what should be done with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > If we cannot keep it up to date, I think we should remove
> > > it, especial
On March 20, 2007 2:16 PM Alfredo Portes wrote:
> ...
> One would think that with so many open source projects out there
> as examples and the great minds that read this list, a working
> development/release method could be achieved :-). But of course
> this probably has been discussed many times
On 3/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Alfredo Portes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> By the way, what should be done with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If we cannot keep it up to date, I think we should remove it, especially
> now that the problems with sourceforge look like they have be
wh-sandbox has implemented a radically different algebra build
process that avoids many of the problems associated with the
old "bootstrap" method. It has also implemented some significant
improvements to the way the Axiom database is built. Therefore
it is not clear to me if it would be possible
On March 20, 2007 12:33 PM Alfredo Portes wrote:
>
> > Bill Page wrote:
> > | From my point of view, the creation of a new "Silver" trunk
> > | is a little overdue.
> >
> Gaby wrote:
> > We need an "upgraded" silver branch for sure. However, we do
> > have severe communication problems.
> >
> >
| From my point of view, the creation of a new "Silver" trunk is
| a little overdue.
We need an "upgraded" silver branch for sure. However, we do have
severe communication problems.
Let's upgrade build-improvements with backports from wh-sandbox.
But why not back porting quick fixes to Silver
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On March 20, 2007 12:23 PM Gaby wrote:
| >
| > Bill Page writes:
| >
| > [...]
| >
| > | I would like to proposed to Gaby and Waldek that we go ahead
| > | and establish wh-sandbox as the new trunk in svn at Sourceforge
| > | as soon as possible. When t
On March 20, 2007 12:23 PM Gaby wrote:
>
> Bill Page writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | I would like to proposed to Gaby and Waldek that we go ahead
> | and establish wh-sandbox as the new trunk in svn at Sourceforge
> | as soon as possible. When that is done, I think it would be
> | appropriate to prepare
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| I would like to proposed to Gaby and Waldek that we go ahead
| and establish wh-sandbox as the new trunk in svn at Sourceforge
| as soon as possible. When that is done, I think it would be
| appropriate to prepare up to date "Silver" binaries for as
Alfredo,
On March 19, 2007 11:36 PM Alfredo Portes wrote:
> ...
> It has been suggested that
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries needs
> to be improved. I suggest using the content of this page:
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxDoyen instead. This
> page of course is only a l
Hi Bill,
tonight I tried to install Axiom on our new linux machine.
so that I could start trying out your program!
unfortunately I did not get very far
I started at the top, and first downloaded
axiom-20050901-3.i386.rpm
There were no instructions about what to do next!
So I guessed that
> Dear Neil, Dear Waldek,
>
> the best thing is to compile and install Waldek's distribution, since it
> contains many important bugfixes which did not yet make it into trunk.
>
> I hope you have subversion installed. (http://subversion.tigris.org/) If so,
> please do the following:
>
> svn co h
Dear Neil, Dear Waldek,
the best thing is to compile and install Waldek's distribution, since it
contains many important bugfixes which did not yet make it into trunk.
I hope you have subversion installed. (http://subversion.tigris.org/) If so,
please do the following:
svn co https://axiom.svn.s
Martin,
tonight I tried to install Axiom on our new linux machine.
so that I could start trying out your program!
unfortunately I did not get very far
I started at the top, and first downloaded
axiom-20050901-3.i386.rpm
There were no instructions about what to do next!
So I guessed that
$
great. please tar up the files and send them to me.
i'll start adding them tonight and see what we get.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
21 matches
Mail list logo
