On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Gaby,
|
| Thanks for the explanation. Now the change makes sense.
|
| Tim wrote:
| >> I see no diff-Naur patch against silver
|
| Gaby wrote:
| > I leave this up to you and for another time.
|
| Why?
Because I suspected that once we have identifi
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Weiss, Juergen wrote:
| Hi,
|
| There should be only one parse - for sure. The old one does
| not support rules for the interpreter. The bootstrap of
| the old parser generator is another difficulty. With at least
| the possibility to use Aldor as the new compiler there
| are
TECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 9:59 PM
> To: Weiss, Juergen
> Cc: Stephen Wilson; axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> Subject: RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: newrule from metalex.lisp
>
> Hi Juergen, thanks for the background.
>
> You're quite right the current s
On 8/9/07, Weiss, Juergen wrote:
> In principle metalex.lisp is used to generate fnewmeta.lisp
> from fnewmeta.meta (and metameta.lisp from metameta.meta).
> metameta.meta is a parser generator written in itself. The
> grammar of the old parser (for the SPAD compiler) is
> defined in the file fnewm
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Weiss, Juergen wrote:
| In principle metalex.lisp is used to generate fnewmeta.lisp
| from fnewmeta.meta (and metameta.lisp from metameta.meta).
| metameta.meta is a parser generator written in itself. The
| grammar of the old parser (for the SPAD compiler) is
| defined in the
s Reis
> Cc: axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: newrule from metalex.lisp
>
> Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > | Gaby,
> > |
>
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> | Gaby,
> |
> | > The routine NEWRULE from metalex.lisp contains the following:
> | >
> | > (test Rule1)
> | >
> | > That line should read
> | >
> | > (test "RULE1")
> |
> | I don't know where metale
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Gaby,
|
| > The routine NEWRULE from metalex.lisp contains the following:
| >
| > (test Rule1)
| >
| > That line should read
| >
| > (test "RULE1")
|
| I don't know where metalex is used anymore.
If metalex is no longer used, then we should just r
