root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Part of the difficulty in our discussions is that we are often
| arguing from different starting points. I tend to start from
| the philosophy and work "top down" and insist that the ideas
| should shape the tools, Some others tend to start with the tool
> Axiom's a pretty complex system, and it seems to have picked up a bunch
> of other projects like clef, noweb, and gcl, and like all good lisp
> systems, even recursive project dependencies like gcl has it's own bfd,
> and gmp.
>
> There is still a set of external dependencies that have to be sa
Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga wrote:
> Axiom's a pretty complex system, and it seems to have picked up a bunch
> of other projects like clef, noweb, and gcl, ...
> What are people thinking about the builds of axiom?
I'm sorry, I just found the September 2006 archive of the
axiom-developer list where the
Humberto Ortiz-Zuazaga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Axiom's a pretty complex system, and it seems to have picked up a bunch
| of other projects like clef, noweb, and gcl, and like all good lisp
| systems, even recursive project dependencies like gcl has it's own bfd,
| and gmp.
|
| There is sti
Axiom's a pretty complex system, and it seems to have picked up a bunch
of other projects like clef, noweb, and gcl, and like all good lisp
systems, even recursive project dependencies like gcl has it's own bfd,
and gmp.
There is still a set of external dependencies that have to be satisfied,
lik
