"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| On August 19, 2006 1:15 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
| >
| > ...
| > Anyway that is a very good example why pile syntax is
| > terrible.
| >
|
| Ralf, I am sorry but your comment makes be rather angry. :(
| I cannot understand why an otherwise very
> Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If someone can try to compile, in a fresh new axiom session,
> > the attached file. I get a segmentation fault.
> >
> > )abbrev domain MYIARR MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray
> > MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray(S:Type, mn:Integer):_
> >
Reproducible, with my compilation of axiom--main-1 on debian sarge.
But have you tried the slightly modified file (see attachment).
I simply have removed the Q... macros. ;-)
Anyway that is a very good example why pile syntax is terrible.
Ralf
)abbrev domain MYIARR MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray
Le samedi 19 août 2006 à 18:59 +0200, Martin Rubey a écrit :
> Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is this bug reproducible ?
>
> Yes it is.
Thank you very much.
> However, I think that the macro definitions should all be indented
> by the same amount.
Exactly, I
Vanuxem Grégory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Is this bug reproducible ?
Yes it is. However, I think that the macro definitions should all be indented
by the same amount. I.e., try
)abbrev domain MYIARR MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray
MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray(S:Type, mn:Integer):_
Hello,
Is this bug reproducible ?
If someone can try to compile, in a fresh new axiom session, the
attached file. I get a segmentation fault.
Greg
)abbrev domain MYIARR MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray
MyIndexedOneDimensionalArray(S:Type, mn:Integer):_
Exports == Implementation wher
