Re: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Axiom-developer] building Axiom with GCL Version_2_6_7pre fails

2005-06-03 Thread Camm Maguire
So 2.6.7pre is axiom ready vis-a-vis this issue? (I know gcl-tk is still pending.) (How is the axiom gcl-tk gui coming?) Take care, "Mike Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Bill. > > | I think that there is one more place in daase.lisp.pamphlet > | near you last patch where probe-file s

RE: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Axiom-developer] building Axiom with GCL Version_2_6_7pre fails

2005-05-29 Thread Bill Page
Mike, On May 29, 2005 9:20 PM you wrote: > ... >The fix then is as follows: > > diff -rN old-axiom--windows--1/src/interp/daase.lisp.pamphlet new-axiom--windows > --1/src/interp/daase.lisp.pamphlet > 843c843 > < (setq thisdir (namestring (probe-file "."))) > --- > > (setq thisdir (namestring

RE: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Axiom-developer] building Axiom with GCL Version_2_6_7pre fails

2005-05-29 Thread Mike Thomas
Hi Bill. | I think that there is one more place in daase.lisp.pamphlet | near you last patch where probe-file should be changed to | truename: | | (dolist (dir dirlist) | (localdatabase nil | (list (list '|dir| | (namestring

RE: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Axiom-developer] building Axiom with GCL Version_2_6_7pre fails

2005-05-29 Thread Mike Thomas
Thanks Bill and Camm. Bill wrote: | On Friday, May 27, 2005 10:06 AM Camm Maguire wrote: | | > ... | > probe-file tests whether a file exists. | > | > probe-file returns false if there is no file named | > pathspec, and otherwise returns the truename of pathspec. | > | > A file here should be sop

Re: [Gcl-devel] RE: [Axiom-developer] building Axiom with GCL Version_2_6_7pre fails

2005-05-27 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! The spec is still a little ambiguous, but these lines indicate to me that GCL, clisp, and corman have it right (don't know why clisp throws an error, but in general I use clisp all the time to test ansi compliance issues.) probe-file tests whether a file exists. probe-file returns fal