Re: Google Code repository (was: [Axiom-developer] Axiom Conference Call Sept 18, 2006)

2006-09-19 Thread Alfredo Portes
On 19 Sep 2006 23:10:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Apparently Google did not increase the size to 200 MB. I got an email that the hosting team would get into contact with me. I'll ping them. -- Gaby Thanks Gaby. ___

Re: Google Code repository (was: [Axiom-developer] Axiom Conference Call Sept 18, 2006)

2006-09-19 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Apparently Google did not increase the size to 200 MB. I got an email that the hosting team would get into contact with me. I'll ping them. -- Gaby ___ Axiom-developer mailing list Axiom-developer@nongnu

Re: Google Code repository (was: [Axiom-developer] Axiom Conference Call Sept 18, 2006)

2006-09-19 Thread Alfredo Portes
The terminology is still rather confusing, but from my point of view the axiom.build-improvements branch is a branch of Silver. So I guess you are asking whether you should put the Silver *trunk* branch into the Google Code archive? Sorry, I should be more explicit :) . Yes I meant having the Si

Google Code repository (was: [Axiom-developer] Axiom Conference Call Sept 18, 2006)

2006-09-19 Thread Page, Bill
On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:18 PM Alfredo Portes wrote: > > > For what I have read, build-improvements will be gone after > Gaby's work is completed and added to Silver -> Gold. > It wont be gone, it will be merged back into Silver Trunk and someday merged into Gold (if/when Tim Daly is co