On October 14, 2006 2:22 PM Gaby wrote:
> ...
> On the other hand, I consider C++ "old" -- it started as "C
> with Classes" around 1979, with first release in 1989. Still,
> today, it draws lots of enthusiasm. I suspect, it [lack of
> enthusiasm for Lisp and Aldor] is not just being old.
>
Goo
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| [...]
|
| | My comment above was partly motivated by my "feeling old"
| | following a meeting with a mostly younger and naturally more
| | enthusiastic group. The contrast with the Axiom project is
| | str
> But, some of the issues I have with the project has less to do with
> its age than some "management" choices that I believe don't push Axiom
> to more exposure.
umm, you're a project "manager". check the sourceforge permissions.
anything you feel needs to be done "for more exposure" is yours to
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| My comment above was partly motivated by my "feeling old"
| following a meeting with a mostly younger and naturally more
| enthusiastic group. The contrast with the Axiom project is
| striking. I guess there is just something not very sexy about
| w
On October 13, 2006 6:34 PM Gaby wrote:
>
> Bill Page writes:
>
> |
> | On October 12, 2006 11:57 AM Alfredo wrote
> | >
> | > Hi Bill,
> | >
> | > Wondering if you are back from Sage Days, and how did it go?
> |
> | Yes, I am back. I would say that it went "well". And I have a
> | lot more t
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Alfredo,
|
| On October 12, 2006 11:57 AM you wrote:
| >
| > Hi Bill,
| >
| > Wondering if you are back from Sage Days, and how did it go?
|
| Yes, I am back. I would say that it went "well". And I have a
| lot more to write about it when I have more t
