axiom-developer@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Suggestion
>
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries
>
> The page does need some reorganization.
>
> Something similar to your table concept, I was thinking of having
> at the beginning of the page so
> > entries in the table can point to the same binaries if they
> > work across multiple platforms so there is no need for a
> > page per table entry.
>
> but then, where are the release notes going to be placed?
place the release note link in the same box as the binary thus:
--
On 11/5/06, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, clearly i think the table organization is clearer :-)
the advantage is that you can see at a glance which binaries
are available, which are downlevel, and which are missing.
that way we can direct efforts at making binaries.
Ok.
entries in the
well, clearly i think the table organization is clearer :-)
the advantage is that you can see at a glance which binaries
are available, which are downlevel, and which are missing.
that way we can direct efforts at making binaries.
entries in the table can point to the same binaries if they
work ac
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/AxiomBinaries
The page does need some reorganization.
Something similar to your table concept, I was thinking of having
at the beginning of the page some kind of index like:
Axiom Binaries
1. Linux
2. Debian
3. Fedora
4. Redhat
5. OS X (PPC)
6. OS X (Intel)
7. W
Bill,
Did you ever add the asq setup?
I don't see it anywhere.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Bill, Alfredo,
I might suggest that we reorganize a portion of the axiom binary
page to use a table form. I placed a mockup at
http://daly.axiom-developer.org/axiombinary
That way we can not only keep track of which binaries are current
for a given platform but we can provide release notes (e.g.
