On November 9, 2005 12:57 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:23PM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> > > ...
> Mike Dewar wrote:
> >
> > > I provided copies of the Axiom product to several people on the
> > > list so you would have had no problem bootstrapping the first
> > >
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:50:51AM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> Do you mean that this original "Axiom product" binary - as distinct
> from the commercial binary version - could have been distributed as
> part of the original open source distribution? If that is true, it
> makes me sad that Tim went to
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:23PM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> > ...
> > > Building Axiom from sources only, which was apparently a
> > > requirement imposed by restrictive licensing conditions which
> > > apparently prevented any of the previously commercial binary
> > > versions of Axiom t
On November 9, 2005 5:40 AM Mike Dewar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:23PM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> ...
> > Building Axiom from sources only, which was apparently a
> > requirement imposed by restrictive licensing conditions which
> > apparently prevented any of the previously commercia
--- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On November 8, 2005 4:55 PM C Y wrote:
> >
> > Personally, I would be happier with a system that can be
> > bootstrapped.
>
> I started writing a long explanation about bootstrapping
> and all that, but thanks to the magic of Wikipedia I don't
> hav
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:09:23PM -0500, Bill Page wrote:
> I am not aware of any of Tim's past sins -- only his present
> ones. ;) Building Axiom from sources only, which was apparently
> a requirement imposed by restrictive licensing conditions which
> apparently prevented any of the previously
On November 8, 2005 4:55 PM C Y wrote:
>
> Personally, I would be happier with a system that can be
> bootstrapped.
I started writing a long explanation about bootstrapping
and all that, but thanks to the magic of Wikipedia I don't
have to bother, I can just point:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
--- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not aware of any of Tim's past sins -- only his present
> ones. ;) Building Axiom from sources only, which was apparently
> a requirement imposed by restrictive licensing conditions which
> apparently prevented any of the previously commercial binary
On November 7, 2005 10:20 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>...
> the task at that time was to rewrite the system into pamphlet
> files. had i proposed such a massive, pervasive rewrite this
> mailing list would have been aflame with opinion. and the
> consensus would certainly have been to NOT do a pamphlet
> r
--- Jay Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > *,
>
> That's wild enough to include me. I really don't have anything to
> contribute, but I thought I should delurk sometime.
Hey Jay! :-). Glad to see you on the list.
> It's probably largely due to hindsight and seeing how things turned
> *,
That's wild enough to include me. I really don't have anything to
contribute, but I thought I should delurk sometime.
> when i first got the code (before it saw the light of day) i spent a
> lot of time thinking about my past sins and letting my mud settle. as
> a result of that navel gazi
11 matches
Mail list logo
