Hi all,
I changed the om node serializing to use get_first_child() ,
get_next_sibling() and removed the code which used
get_first_child , get_next_child methods .
pls apply this patch
thanks
nandika
serialize
Description: Binary data
HenrikWith Axis/Java we kept the mailing list the same with a [Axis2] marker in the subject line. It did help because people had often already coded things in Axis1 that came up in Axis2 and so there was the opportunity for sharing of ideas/experience and code.
PaulOn 11/10/05, Henrik Nordberg <[E
From: "Samisa Abeysinghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:24 AM
Subject: [Axis2] Jira for Axis2C
Hi All,
I feels like it is time that we setup Jira for Axis2C, given that we
have OM working.
I think it is best to have an inde
IChannel operator >>() should not have const parameter.
---
Key: AXISCPP-870
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-870
Project: Axis-C++
Type: Improvement
Components: Transport (axis3)
Versions:
Incorrect function signature in exception classes.
--
Key: AXISCPP-869
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-869
Project: Axis-C++
Type: Improvement
Components: Basic Architecture
Versions: 1.5 Final
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-868?page=all ]
John Hawkins updated AXISCPP-868:
-
Fix Version: 1.6 Alpha
Version: 1.5 Final
(was: 1.6 Alpha)
> "Connection: Close" ignored
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-868?page=all ]
John Hawkins updated AXISCPP-868:
-
Version: 1.6 Alpha
(was: 1.5 Final)
> "Connection: Close" ignored
> ---
>
> Key: AXISCPP-868
> URL
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-868?page=all ]
John Hawkins reassigned AXISCPP-868:
Assign To: John Hawkins
> "Connection: Close" ignored
> ---
>
> Key: AXISCPP-868
> URL: http://issues.apache.
+1 for a independent jira.
Thanks
-Lilantha
-Original Message-
From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 5:24 AM
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List
Subject: [Axis2] Jira for Axis2C
Hi All,
I feels like it is time that we setup Jira for Axis2C,
Great! Then, making Axis2C API model similar to commons-logging will
make more sense.
Thanks
-Lilantha
-Original Message-
From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:25 PM
To: Apache AXIS C Developers List
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Please use logging
"Connection: Close" ignored
---
Key: AXISCPP-868
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-868
Project: Axis-C++
Type: Bug
Components: Transport (Client)
Versions: 1.5 Final
Reporter: John Hawkins
Test using a getQuot
Hi,
can you give me more context on where
this element is please. We can't see why this as it stands would fail.
Can you give us the complete wsdl - or at least the snippet that contains
where it is.
"Franz Fehringer"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/11/2005 09:33
To
John Hawkins/UK/[EMAIL P
Hi All,
I feels like it is time that we setup Jira for Axis2C, given that we
have OM working.
I think it is best to have an independant Jira for Axis2C as we have
to minimize mix-ups with Axis C++ 1.x issues.
Thoughts please...
Thanks,
Samisa...
Hello
John,
The
problem is that wsdl2ws cannot cope with element tags without type
attributes.
So
instead of
Describes any errors that occur during system
operation.
i have
to write
Describes
any errors that occur during
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-860?page=comments#action_12357203
]
John Hawkins commented on AXISCPP-860:
--
Sorry for confusion. Yes "qualified" means that we do qualify each element with
ns. I was just thinking that while you're in thi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-860?page=comments#action_12357201
]
Dushshantha Chandradasa commented on AXISCPP-860:
-
I'm a bit confused here. the wasdl says that the schema is elementFormDefault
qualified.
http://complexl
16 matches
Mail list logo