Re: [Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-08 Thread Dimuthu Gamage
+1 On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Milinda Pathirage milinda.pathir...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Milinda, Thanks On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva supu...@gmail.comwrote: +1. Having this function is really confusing to the users. Supun On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:55 AM,

Re: [Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-06 Thread Milinda Pathirage
+1 Milinda, Thanks On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Supun Kamburugamuva supu...@gmail.comwrote: +1. Having this function is really confusing to the users. Supun On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Manjula Peiris

[Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-04 Thread Manjula Peiris
Hi, Since we have removed Wooden and XMLschema code long time back, there is no point of keeping this function. So I would like to remove this from the API. WDYT ? -- Manjula Peiris Senior Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. Oxygenating the Web Service Platform. http://wso2.org/ Blog:

Re: [Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-04 Thread Dinesh Premalal
Manjula Peiris manj...@wso2.com writes: Hi, Since we have removed Wooden and XMLschema code long time back, there is no point of keeping this function. So I would like to remove this from the API. WDYT ? +1 thanks, Dinesh

Re: [Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-04 Thread Uthaiyashankar
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Manjula Peiris manj...@wso2.com wrote: Hi, Since we have removed Wooden and XMLschema code long time back, there is no point of keeping this function. So I would like to remove this from the API. WDYT ? +1 Regards, Shankar -- Manjula Peiris Senior

Re: [Fwd: Re: client dynamic invocation]

2009-03-04 Thread Supun Kamburugamuva
+1. Having this function is really confusing to the users. Supun On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Uthaiyashankar shan...@wso2.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Manjula Peiris manj...@wso2.com wrote: Hi, Since we have removed Wooden and XMLschema code long time back, there is no