[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-373?page=history ]
Fred Preston resolved AXISCPP-373:
----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Updates complete.
> To change the names of the Channel and Channel_ssl properties to include a
> http reference
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXISCPP-373
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-373
> Project: Axis-C++
> Type: Improvement
> Environment: n/a
> Reporter: Fred Preston
> Assignee: Fred Preston
>
> +1
> IMHO it is better to use HTTP instead of http and SSL for ssl.
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
> On 06 Jan 2005 16:53:43 +0600, Roshan Weerasuriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi Fred,
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Roshan
> > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:47, Fred Preston wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > Looking into the future, are we happy with the naming conventions we
> > > currently have to identify the components within axiscpp.conf? I was
> > > thinking specifically about what happens if we develop another transport?
> > > The name for the http transport is 'Transport_http' (which is probably
> > > fine), but the name for an http implemented ssl channel is 'Channel_ssl'
> > > and I want to define a non-secure http channel dll, i.e. 'Channel'. Now
> > > we
> > > may want to reuse these names for different transports, therefore what I'm
> > > suggesting is that we make a more transport specific distinction for the
> > > channel implementations. Thus:-
> > >
> > > 'Channel_ssl' becomes 'Channel_http_ssl' and
> > > 'Channel' becomes 'Channel_http'.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Fred Preston.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
