Fixed the link. Sorry I have fixed that in my local machine but has
forgotten to commit that.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
we need to fix it...here's the correct url:
http://ws.apache.org/axis2/download.cgi
thanks,
dims
On 9/29/05, Simon Fell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on http://ws
Simon Fell wrote:
on http://ws.apache.org/axis2/ the download now, and download it links
for the 0.92 release take you to
http://ws.apache.org/axis2/releases.html which only has 0.9 & 0.91.
Cheers
Simon
Given that you are on the mail list, can I add feature reqs to your
tcptrace/proxytrace a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-249?page=comments#action_12330918 ]
Steve Loughran commented on AXIS2-249:
--
XMLBeans does go overboard in generation
+1 to a lightweight Xom binding :)
> Exessive number & size of files generated from WSDL
CommonsHTTPSender + Axis 1.2.1 generates garbage in SOAP xml
Key: AXIS-2242
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242
Project: Apache Axis
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.2, 1.2.1
Environment: winn
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330922 ]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on AXIS-2242:
-
I suspect what you see is the chunk header, which is perfectly valid assuming
the chunk encoding is being used. If you attach
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330923 ]
Nils-Helge Garli commented on AXIS-2242:
DEBUG httpclient.wire.header - >> "POST /SomeSoapService/service
HTTP/1.1[\r][\n]"
DEBUG httpclient.wire.header - >> "Content
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330925 ]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on AXIS-2242:
-
> DEBUG httpclient.wire.header - >> "Transfer-Encoding: chunked[\r][\n]"
Here you go. The request appears to be perfectly we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330927 ]
Nils-Helge Garli commented on AXIS-2242:
No, but I'll check that out.
Is there a way I can change the transfer encoding with Axis?
Thank you for your assistance!
> C
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330935 ]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on AXIS-2242:
-
I have to plead complete ignorance about Axis, so I leave this report to Axis
folks to pick up. As far as HttpClient is conce
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project ws-axis-xerces-HEAD has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2242?page=comments#action_12330936 ]
Steve Loughran commented on AXIS-2242:
--
Can I add that the POST request clearly says "HTTP/1.1", and the HTTP1.1 spec
cleary says
All HTTP/1.1 applications MUST be abl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-242?page=comments#action_12330937 ]
Ruchith Udayanga Fernando commented on AXIS2-242:
-
Fixed this problem for the blocking case.
Several instances of msgContext.setOperationContext(operationContext
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:33 -0700, Simon Fell wrote:
> Other fun facts & figures, the axis binary download weights in at
> 33Mb, compared to 24Mb for the entire .NET 1.1 runtime installer.
That's absolutely pathetic and unacceptable :(.
So let's start pairing this down:
- let's move the security
Hi All,
On 9/30/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:33 -0700, Simon Fell wrote:
> > Other fun facts & figures, the axis binary download weights in at
> > 33Mb, compared to 24Mb for the entire .NET 1.1 runtime installer.
>
> That's absolutely pathetic and u
done
Thanks,
Deepal
~Future is Open~
- Original Message -
From: "Chamil Thanthrimudalige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:38 AM
Subject: [Axis2] Web admin changes
hi,
I have done some ch
Hi,
Please see my comments below:
On 9/29/05, vikas kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks ruchit for the comments..
> But i have a few more doubts..
> There is only one instance of the handler and module implementaion classes,
> is there only one instance of the chain too??
Yes there's only on
Extracting WS-Addressing properties (E.g. Action) form WSDL
---
Key: AXIS2-250
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-250
Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Type: Improvement
Components: wsdl
Repo
I'd glad that the team decided to release the last cut as 0.9.2 rather
than 1.0 Alpha and I'd like to explain my reasons in a little more
depth (now that the release is cut). I think everyone appreciates the
efforts that have been put into get this far.
IMHO Axis2 0.9.2 is a more appropriate desc
robert burrell donkin wrote:
I'd glad that the team decided to release the last cut as 0.9.2 rather than
1.0 Alpha and I'd like to explain my reasons in a little more depth (now
that the release is cut). I think everyone appreciates the efforts that have
been put into get this far.
IMHO Axis2 0.
will this eventually be part of betwixt?
robert burrell donkin wrote:
it seems to have gone a little quiet but i have been working on
fleshing out some of the ideas for the mapping view discussed earlier.
i've pulling some ideas together here
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/tool (mapping1.htm
Is it my imagination, or is proxy support in CommonsHttpTransport still
a todo item :(
Hi,
I am using axis 1.2.1 to create the client proxy
code for .NET Web Service using WSDL2Java tool.
All the classes and methods get created correctly
except for the following request.
Yep!!! http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-153
On 9/30/05, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it my imagination, or is proxy support in CommonsHttpTransport still
> a todo item :(
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Key phrase is -- "until Axis2 is feature complete". Eran
keeps asking for feedback and don't get any :(
Could you please help put together the features list? Get OK's from everyone?
thanks,
dims
On 9/30/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd glad that the team de
FYI, http://www.pocketsoap.com/weblog/2005/09/1562.html
Now does everyone feel better that we used 0.9.2 instead of 1.0 Alpha :)
-- dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-248?page=all ]
Ruchith Udayanga Fernando resolved AXIS2-248:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed
> WSDL with headers generates uncompilable code
> -
>
>
+1 on breaking out the war and binary download and slimming down the
kit.
I would like to keep WS-Security support in the primary Axis2 distro. I
think it is very valuable to have this support 'out of the box' as a
selling point for Axis, similar to its support of WS-Addressing.
--
Tom Jordahl
M
Thanks Jaliya
Fixed it. Can someone update the site
On 9/29/05, Jaliya Ekanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found that we have used Call and MessageSender in wrong places under the
> Client API section of the Architecture Guide.
>
> Under the client AP-> One-way Messaging Support
>
Dims wrote:
> Key phrase is -- "until Axis2 is feature complete". Eran
> keeps asking for feedback and don't get any :(
I gave him some (full WSDL 2.0 support)! :-) I didn't say he (or
Sanjiva) liked it.
I would also like to see:
- native databinding support
- rpc/encoded client su
Tom,
Was talking about everyone else :) We need to come up with a
consolidated list and negotiate on what we can do and when :)
Seriously, WSDL2.0 is not on my plate for 1.0 release. because Woden
is not ready. their next milestone is in november. Unless you can help
them push it along we can't d
Yes, there's a lot of schema, this is a real world service that handles
millions of requests a day, not some hello world sample.
It seems incredable to me, that you need to generate 20x more files than
Axis 1.1, yet its considered acceptible, Am I the only one that thinks
this is completely out of
The HTTP transport should support everything in the Axis 1.1 transport,
including proxies, gzip, ntlm auth etc.
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 7:24 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; robert burrell donkin
Subject: Re: [Axis
I hope everyone spots the smilly in my blog post.
But first impressions count for a lot, and frankly my first impression
of Axis2 wasn't good.
A) the download links for 0.92 on the main axis2 site took you to a page
which didn't mention 0.92
B) the release notes in 0.92 say it's 0.91
C) was shock
Simon Fell wrote:
> It seems incredable to me, that you need to generate 20x more files
than
> Axis 1.1, yet its considered acceptible, Am I the only one that thinks
> this is completely out of control ?
Nope.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
XML comments in transmitted documents cause ClassCastExceptions
---
Key: AXIS2-251
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-251
Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Type: Bug
Components: databinding
OMNode, OMDocument use OMOutputImpl - violating package encapsulation
-
Key: AXIS2-252
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-252
Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Type: Improvement
Compone
/me takes responsibility :)
Fixed A,B,D. C is in progress.
-- dims
On 9/30/05, Simon Fell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope everyone spots the smilly in my blog post.
>
> But first impressions count for a lot, and frankly my first impression
> of Axis2 wasn't good.
>
> A) the download links fo
Me Neither. We need to fix it.
-- dims
On 9/30/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Fell wrote:
> > It seems incredable to me, that you need to generate 20x more files
> than
> > Axis 1.1, yet its considered acceptible, Am I the only one that thinks
> > this is completely out of con
Yep. We have a JIRA issue open for that.
-- dims
On 9/30/05, Simon Fell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The HTTP transport should support everything in the Axis 1.1 transport,
> including proxies, gzip, ntlm auth etc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've got two OM questions at the moment:
1) What the heck does "OMNode.serializeWithCache()" mean? How is it
different from "OMNode.serialize()"? I was hoping to put some Javadoc
on the function(s) but couldn't figure out from inspection what the
substantive difference was.
2) What is the
Hehehe...i asked the same question #1 last week when i met Eran in
Synapse F2F. Eran, Please check if my understanding below is correct.
Suppose you are building an om structure by reading stuff from a
stream and you are half-way through it you want to serialize
everything (including the stuff for
Hi,
I'm not the best person to answer 1. So I'll be leaving it out.
Regarding 2
An OMText can be used to hold binary data. (isBinary flag is used to track this). A MTOM message can contain Base64 encoded strings together with MTOM optimised parts.Binary data stored in OMText can be serialised
As far as I understood you need the transaction handlers to be get
called by the same thread that will call the Service impl.
I think you are safe ..in Axis2 the Service impl is called by
component called a Message Receiver .. there could be Sync or Async.
If you use the Sync one (which is the de
Hi,
Please see my comments below:
On 9/30/05, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got two OM questions at the moment:
>
> 1) What the heck does "OMNode.serializeWithCache()" mean? How is it
> different from "OMNode.serialize()"? I was hoping to put some Javadoc
> on the function(s) b
AbstractTransportSender uses the HTTPTransportUtils to check for MTOM
optimizing of a message
-
Key: AXIS2-253
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-253
Project: Apache Axi
Ruchith Fernando wrote:
On 9/30/05, Eric Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) What is the OMText "optimized" property? It is never set via
"setOptimized", and never inspected via "isOptimized." I'm guessing
that this was meant to be the "optimized" part of MTOM, but since it is
never set
Thanks for the response.
That seems weird, though. That means if you call the serialize function
(without the cache), the OMDocument can effectively be corrupted.
I found myself putting this comment on OMDocument.serialize()
* Caution: Serializing without caching means that any portion o
Hi,
There were a lot of test methods commented out in 'whitemesa.round2',
because they were failing. all of them are uncommented now and
whitemesa.round2 is excluded from itests.
Thanks,
Ruchith
On 9/30/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> :( am getting tired deleting jun
get methods Axis2 properties in the message context search the hierarchy
of contexts before return null. (See "Information Model" in the Archi document.)
That means the searches that would be successful are OK but the
searches that would fail are very bad as they search the complete
hierarchy befo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-243?page=all ]
Eric Johnson updated AXIS2-243:
---
Attachment: javadoc2.patch
Could someone re-open the bug? More patches to come.
This patch fixes some more Javadoc warnings. The "om" package itself should now
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> +1 on breaking out the war and binary download and slimming down the
> kit.
>
> I would like to keep WS-Security support in the primary Axis2 distro. I
> think it is very valuable to have this support 'out of the box' as a
> selling point fo
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 09:45 -0700, Simon Fell wrote:
> Yes, there's a lot of schema, this is a real world service that handles
> millions of requests a day, not some hello world sample.
>
> It seems incredable to me, that you need to generate 20x more files than
> Axis 1.1, yet its considered acce
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:47 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Me Neither. We need to fix it.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 9/30/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Simon Fell wrote:
> > > It seems incredable to me, that you need to generate 20x more files
> > than
> > > Axis 1.1, yet its considere
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 16:39 -0500, Srinath Perera wrote:
> get methods Axis2 properties in the message context search the hierarchy
> of contexts before return null. (See "Information Model" in the Archi
> document.)
>
> That means the searches that would be successful are OK but the
> searches t
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:16 -0700, Eric Johnson wrote:
> Thanks for the response.
>
> That seems weird, though. That means if you call the serialize function
> (without the cache), the OMDocument can effectively be corrupted.
Its a necessary feature .. that allows one to process headers and the
Yes. We imply that we should have our own databinding :)
-- dims
On 9/30/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:47 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Me Neither. We need to fix it.
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 9/30/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-243?page=all ]
Davanum Srinivas reopened AXIS2-243:
Reopening issue as per Eric.
> Missing javadoc, javadoc warnings, undocumented behavior
>
>
>
how about a flag to specifically search parents? or even a flag with
bits flipped on which parent in the hierarchy should be searched
explicitly?
On 9/30/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 16:39 -0500, Srinath Perera wrote:
> > get methods Axis2 properties i
+1 from me.
On 9/30/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 12:09 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> > +1 on breaking out the war and binary download and slimming down the
> > kit.
> >
> > I would like to keep WS-Security support in the primary Axis2 distro. I
> > thin
Hi Srinath
See my comments below;
Thanks,
Deepal
~Future is Open~
- Original Message -
From: "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 3:39 AM
Subject: [Axis2]search for poperties not reg
hi,
I written a small how to on making your own transport. Can some one with
enough please have a look at it and then commit.
Thank You !
Best Regards,
Chamil Thantrimudalige.
Index: xdocs/transport_howto.html
===
--- xdocs/trans
done
Thanks,
Deepal
~Future is Open~
- Original Message -
From: "Chamil Thanthrimudalige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 11:22 AM
Subject: [Axis2] Transport howto
hi,
I written a small how t
The architecture documentation of Axis2
says there is MessageValidation phase at the end of an InPipe and a MessageInitialization
at the beginning of an OutPipe. But at run time I don't see messages going
through any phases like that. So just wanted to know if these two phases
are just virtual pha
63 matches
Mail list logo
