[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1712?page=all ]
Ulf Licht updated AXIS-1712:
Attachment: getSalesOrderList.wsdl
getSalesOrderList.SOAPRequest.xml
This SOAP request was generated by AXIS 1.3 using the also attached WSDL. All
optio
RTMF.
Check the FAQ/Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis/WsdlFile
Also check the documentation here:
http://ws.apache.org/axis/java/reference.html#DeploymentWSDDReference
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
From: Manivannan
Gopalan [mailto
Can we know the participants to this chat as its night here for Sri
Lankans ?
Anyway, I don't think I can make it to the chat this time. Sorry :-(
The Axis2 ChatBot wrote:
>Hi folks!
>
>This is an automatic reminder that the weekly Axis2 developer chat
>will be occurring tomorrow, November 16, a
Hi folks!
This is an automatic reminder that the weekly Axis2 developer chat
will be occurring tomorrow, November 16, at:
5AM PST, 8AM EST, 1PM GMT, 7PM SLT, midnight (next day) AEST
The chat takes place on the freenode IRC network, (use server
irc.freenode.net), on channel #apache-axis, and is
Really??? :)
-- dims
On 11/15/05, Doug Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try ws-polling http://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-polling/
> Axis might have support for it soon :-)
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
> John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 11/15/2005 09:53 AM
>
> Please respond to
> axis-dev
>
>
> To ax
+1 from me as well.
-- dims
On 11/15/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 15:41 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
> >
> > Now, what part of RFC2616 is Axis2's URL handling exempt from? Unless I
> > hear a good reason wny ?
>
> :)
>
> > params should be intermitten
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-304?page=comments#action_12357712 ]
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS2-304:
can the "robust"-ness can be a parameter in either the xml files and/or the
message context parameters?
> InOnly MEP blocks th
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1712?page=all ]
Davanum Srinivas reopened AXIS-1712:
Please upload your WSDL and soap messages.
thanks,
dims
> Adding empty elements to soap message: make a configurable option
>
> I don't think its a good idea to use RM's sequence ID header because
> it'll conflict when echoing back: reference params become regular
> headers and then you could end up with two RM sequence ID headers, which
> would be a bit ugly. (Even if it can be made to work .. with the W3C
> versions of
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-304?page=comments#action_12357705 ]
Thilina Gunarathne commented on AXIS2-304:
--
A bit of thinking on to this issue gave me the following ideas.
1. We need a MessageSender(MessageSender handles Robust
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 15:41 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Now, what part of RFC2616 is Axis2's URL handling exempt from? Unless I
> hear a good reason wny ?
:)
> params should be intermittently used for
> dispatching, I am going to tweak dispatch so that ? strings are always
> dropped on
Steve Loughran wrote:
2. Addresses with ?name=value parts are not handled properly in the POST
header or dispatch.
(a) the ?name=value bit of the URL is duplicated in the POST.
this is fixed, but dispatch is still broken. Look. If the service URL
has a / in it, then ? string stripping enga
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 09:42 -0500, Srinath Perera wrote:
> Hi Eran,Steve;
>
> I am +1 for adding a referance parameter as that provide a way to use
> the hierachy provided by the Axis2 to it's real ability. I have two
> sugessions
>
> 1) If possible use something standarized, e.g. sequnce ID from
Try ws-polling http://www.w3.org/Submission/ws-polling/
Axis might have support for it soon
:-)
-Doug
John Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/15/2005 09:53 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
To
axis-dev@ws.apache.org
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Fw: WS-Callback support in
Axis?
You are looking for Synapse...which is under active development. Ask
on the synapse-dev mailing list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-synapse-dev/
to subscribe send email to synapse-dev-subscribe AT ws.apache.org.
thanks,
dims
On 11/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Axis users/developers!
First, I would like to apologize for cross-posting (to both user and dev mailing
list), but i couldn't decide which of the lists would be more suitable
for my problem.
I need to implement a mechanism that would allow clients from the
internet to access web services on
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:52 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
> well, it's seemingly gratuitous because it exposes an implementation
> detail (axis2) and a concept (sessions), that I dont want.
Good point. We clearly need to be able to allow this .. and I guess it
should come into being if the service
Folks,
Any one got a better way?
- Forwarded by John
Hawkins/UK/IBM on 15/11/2005 14:39 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
14/11/2005 18:50
Please respond to
"Apache AXIS C User List"
To
axis-c-user@ws.apache.org
cc
Subject
RE: WS-Callback support in
Axis?
Hi John,
Ok, her
Eran Chinthaka wrote:
Steve,
Let me answer the first question (only ;-) )
Steve Loughran wrote:
I've just got my code moved up to SVN head, and things are not
dispatching right. I've been looking through the tracelogs and here
are some issues to raise
1. In the response to an operation, t
Hi Eran,Steve;
I am +1 for adding a referance parameter as that provide a way to use
the hierachy provided by the Axis2 to it's real ability. I have two
sugessions
1) If possible use something standarized, e.g. sequnce ID from the RM
spec rather than sending axis2 header. I think it is good Idea
Eran,
my 2 cents, the ServiceGroupContext RefP stuff should not be on by
default. If it is then there should be a way to switch it off as well.
thanks,
dims
On 11/15/05, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Let me answer the first question (only ;-) )
>
> Steve Loughran wrote:
Steve,
Let me answer the first question (only ;-) )
Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> I've just got my code moved up to SVN head, and things are not
> dispatching right. I've been looking through the tracelogs and here
> are some issues to raise
>
>
> 1. In the response to an operation, the reply to ad
Hi Trebor,
If you like to contribute we are more than happy to welcome you in. I
think you gonna implement In-Only
MEP (Fire and Forget) and polish up Robust
In-Only, we have implemented.
So please create a JIRA on this and go ahead with the implementation.
If you need any help, just don't hes
Jira issue created..
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-304
Thanks,
~Thilina
On 11/15/05, trebor iksrazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question: Is there currently _any_ way that a clientcan get an immediate return of http 200 ? I have a
long running task on the server side - 6 to 20minute
InOnly MEP blocks the caller till the operation finishes...
---
Key: AXIS2-304
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-304
Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Type: Bug
Components: core
Repo
I've just got my code moved up to SVN head, and things are not
dispatching right. I've been looking through the tracelogs and here are
some issues to raise
1. In the response to an operation, the reply to address contains
seemingly gratuitous ServiceGroup reference parameters. Why?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1712?page=comments#action_12357673 ]
Ulf Licht commented on AXIS-1712:
-
Still not fixed in Axis 1.3. Isn't it possible to make it switchable instead of
hardcoding it?
> Adding empty elements to soap message: make
27 matches
Mail list logo
