Sorry there was a small mistake , but we fixed that :) , you wont get
such a behavior in 0.95
and if you are going to use addressing , don't forget to put action else
you will be getting a nice exception :)
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have enabled addressing in the axis2.xml
> And w
Concurrency problem in Axis using JAX-RPC
-
Key: AXIS-2445
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2445
Project: Apache Axis
Type: Bug
Components: Basic Architecture
Versions: 1.2.1
Environment: Axis 1.2.1
S
Hi All,I have enabled addressing in the axis2.xml And when checked from web console I see addressing module as engaged.Also the handler chain containes the addressing handlers.But I don't even see the "To" wsa header.
However in the log I see the message addressing disabled.Can anybody tell me what
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
Hi All,
I have done some work in the JMX interface. Please commit the patch to the url:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/archive/java/scratch
It uses the management classes https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/trunk/archive/java/scratch/Axis_Management_m
cool!! :), when I looked at the code yesterday (when jaliya
mentioned the problem) I saw it and thought it is better to discuss it
in the list ... so other deveopers get to know about the stateless
assumptions we made.
Thanks
Srinath
On 3/22/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You
Hi Benjamin,
Can you send your code, better create a JIRA and attach your code. I
will re-produce and look in to the bug.
BTW, the message you have constructed is wrong. You will never have
wsa:EndpointReference element in the soap header.
chinthaka
Benjamin Bender wrote:
Hi I'm using A
You being one of the pioneers in Axis2, how can you talk abt some old
code ? ;-) Get an svn up and you will see they are no more like that.
Srinath Perera wrote:
On 3/21/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have not kept this attribute across multiple invocations of the same
> > On 3/21/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have not kept this attribute across multiple invocations of the same
> > > handler. Its *within* one invocation of that handler.
>
> Are you keeping an instance var that holds some value across two or more
> methods in the same
Folks,
As per previous discussion, i've updated my nightly scripts to
generate jars w/o the version #'s
http://cvs.apache.org/repository/ws-commons/jars/
Please update your project dependencies. BTW, i've added tracer
SNAPSHOT jar as well.
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blo
Ajith : you have forgotten the prefix
Hi all,
While trying to test the Axis2 web archive in a JDK 1.5 environment we
discovered the following problem.
When the WSDL is asked for, you see a class not found exception due to
the presence of the xml-apis.jar. The TransformerFactory is picked
from
Hi all,
While trying to test the Axis2 web archive in a JDK 1.5 environment we
discovered the following problem.
When the WSDL is asked for, you see a class not found exception due to
the presence of the xml-apis.jar. The TransformerFactory is picked
from the xml-apis.jar rather than the runtime an
Hmm, i had done something similar in Axis1 using Commons Modeler.
-- dims
On 3/22/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having an MBean means it can be managed by any JMX platform .. so lots
> of value there.
>
> IIRC Dims did commit some code like that. Dims??
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> On
Where do i find the Maven 1.1 release?
On maven.apache.org i only see Maven 1.1 Beta 2?
And will the Axis2 build be based on Maven 2? 8-)
Greetings
Franz
Eran Chinthaka schrieb:
What is the dependency we have on maven snapshots ? ;-)
And maven released 1.1 and even 2.0 long time back.
Eran Chinthaka wrote:
What is the dependency we have on maven snapshots ? ;-)
And maven released 1.1 and even 2.0 long time back.
I updated the dependency settings last week to the main releases of stuff.
one funny is that there is an XmlSchema1.0 in the m2 repository, but not
the maven
What is the dependency we have on maven snapshots ? ;-)
And maven released 1.1 and even 2.0 long time back.
Franz Fehringer wrote:
Perhaps the Maven folks could be triggered for a 1.1 release also?
regards
Franz
Ajith Ranabahu schrieb:
Hi Steve,
I know the exact problem and we are p
Nothing to worry I fixed it, as soon as I saw Jaliya's mail.
I was fighting for the wording. Never mind, I had enough wars for the
day ;-) .
-- Chinthaka
Srinath Perera wrote:
Hi Eran;
IMHO Stateless does not talk only about across multiple invocations,
just like EJB it simply say user sho
Perhaps the Maven folks could be triggered for a 1.1 release also?
regards
Franz
Ajith Ranabahu schrieb:
Hi Steve,
I know the exact problem and we are planning to address it. We have
already planned the major components (such as axiom and policy) to be
released before the 1.0. These compo
It would be great to have a reference to the code base.
An alternate approach to do it would be (in case we deploy axis2 as a war):
1) In the Axisservlet register an Mbean with notification capabilities at
startup (init)
2) From Synapse we could capture management related details
3) Send the detai
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 07:01 -0500, Srinath Perera wrote:
> Hi Eran;
>
> IMHO Stateless does not talk only about across multiple invocations,
> just like EJB it simply say user should not be looking at the states
> on the Handler anytime.
+1.
> On 3/21/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:16 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
Hey, I have that @work too. Proxies, you understand.
I have to put my laptop up on the WLAN as a guest for the day, which
means going to the
appropriate IT page and registering a guest (me) under the supervision
Having an MBean means it can be managed by any JMX platform .. so lots
of value there.
IIRC Dims did commit some code like that. Dims??
Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 17:58 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> well we have something similar to that :)
>
> and you can do that by adding Observers in
Done - sorry about that - I thought
I had already done that.
-Doug
"Jarek Gawor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/22/2006 12:20 AM
Please respond to
axis-dev
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
test.functional.TestWSA
This test currently fails in trunk because the dependent
sample
Hi Eran;
IMHO Stateless does not talk only about across multiple invocations,
just like EJB it simply say user should not be looking at the states
on the Handler anytime.
In our initial discussion, need to avoid the syncronizing handlers was
one of the reason to make things stateless. Stateless H
well we have something similar to that :)
and you can do that by adding Observers into Axis2. And there was a GSOC
project which used that technique.
Soumadeep wrote:
>Sanjiva,
>
>Wasn't aware of Chathura's situation, I do appreciate his efforts.
>
>>From an axis2 perspective can we at least hav
Sanjiva,
Wasn't aware of Chathura's situation, I do appreciate his efforts.
>From an axis2 perspective can we at least have a Management Mbean, which can
broadcast notifications so that any external application can listen to
events generated by ASIX2 by registering to that Mbean?
Thanks
Soumadee
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:16 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Hey, I have that @work too. Proxies, you understand.
> I have to put my laptop up on the WLAN as a guest for the day, which
> means going to the
> appropriate IT page and registering a guest (me) under the supervision
> of an employee
Soumadeep wrote:
Hi Ruchith,
:) it's not a question of binding anyone to anything, everyone is free to do
what they want but as an individual one needs to be committed to a cause, in
this case help the community to get the best possible output within a
timeframe, it's self discipline . My conce
+1
Amen !!!
On 3/22/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:16 +0530, Soumadeep wrote:
> > [Soumadeep] An open source community doesn't mean that it's doesn't share
> > any time lines or responsibilities, I completely disagree with your
> > statement as abov
Hi Ruchith,
:) it's not a question of binding anyone to anything, everyone is free to do
what they want but as an individual one needs to be committed to a cause, in
this case help the community to get the best possible output within a
timeframe, it's self discipline . My concern is that this sho
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:16 +0530, Soumadeep wrote:
> [Soumadeep] An open source community doesn't mean that it's doesn't share
> any time lines or responsibilities, I completely disagree with your
> statement as above
> No matter what your other obligation may be if you take a responsibility
> be
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:14 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
Hi,
I think chathura answered your questions yesterday.
Checkout the archive at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114292862001333&w=2
BTW Chathura is still a student. Still opensource mailing lists are
Ahumm..
I'm not sure whether you are familiar with the Apache way here. Apache
never puts hard and fast rules on the community saying that every
query in the mailing list should be answered. Infact the CLA
(Contributors Licence Agreement) section 6 specifially states that a
committer is not obliged
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:14 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi,
> I think chathura answered your questions yesterday.
> Checkout the archive at
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114292862001333&w=2
>
> BTW Chathura is still a student. Still opensource mailing lists are
> not guranteed to
correction:
> I don't think Chathura is not a committer
I don't think Chathura is a committer
Thanks,
Ruchith
Hi Soumadeep,
> No matter what your other obligation may be if you take a responsibility
> being a committer you should see to it that it's done ASAP. I thing the
> moderator/release manager should take note of this. Someone has to be
> answerable no matter what. As community members we all are an
Ajit,
My fault, I missed Chathura's mail, Thanks for the link.
Some comments though... (inline)
Thanks
Soumadeep
-Original Message-
From: Ajith Ranabahu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 3:45 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Management Interface
Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
Hi Steve,
I know the exact problem and we are planning to address it. We have
already planned the major components (such as axiom and policy) to be
released before the 1.0. These components are fairly stable and can be
released without a problem.
So it's going to be based on
Hi Steve,
I know the exact problem and we are planning to address it. We have
already planned the major components (such as axiom and policy) to be
released before the 1.0. These components are fairly stable and can be
released without a problem.
So it's going to be based on some standard versions
Hi,
I think chathura answered your questions yesterday.
Checkout the archive at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114292862001333&w=2
BTW Chathura is still a student. Still opensource mailing lists are
not guranteed to give you answers on a time line you want it to be. No
one is obliged t
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 21:55 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
One caveat. Once you get to 1.0, you are making some promise of stability.
I am still trying to get code that worked with 0.93 working on 0.95
snapshot, it looks like the dynamic classloading stuff is using the
Chathura,
I am still
waiting for an answer, could you please reply.
Thanks
Soumadeep
-Original
Message-
From: Soumadeep
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 1:05
PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: [Axis2] Management
Interface
Chathura,
Ext
Hi,
this seems a minor issue,
dwarfed by the overall soap-overhead and
compensated for by faster dezerialisation.
Cheers,
--- Benjamin Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I'm using Axis2 for Java and I try to send
> messages with the following
> content and
> the following style between th
Hi Ben,
We've seen this issue earlier (it's no harm though - the XML is
semantically correct, except for the inefficient serialization). It
seems to be an issue in the woodstox XMLStreamWriter since I noticed
that this is not there anymore for the Reference implementation!
Ajith
On 3/22/06, Benj
Hi I'm using Axis2 for Java and I try
to send messages with the following content and
the following style between the server
and a client
http://localhost:5988/root/cimv2:Linux_OperatingSystem
xmlns:linux_os="http://localhost:8080/WSDM/Linux_OperatingSy
45 matches
Mail list logo