[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1379?page=all ]
Thilina Gunarathne resolved AXIS2-1379.
---
Resolution: Fixed
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464128
Jake,
Please check whether this solves your issue...
Thanks,
~Thilina
> Base
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1380?page=comments#action_12442366 ]
Thilina Gunarathne commented on AXIS2-1380:
---
try this
http://people.apache.org/~thilina/axis2/1.1-RC1/eclipse_codegen_plugin_1.1-RC1/
thanks,
~Thilina
>
About the Async MR case.. I checked the code and things seem to have
gone to the correct places...
But we need more testing!!!
~Thilina
On 10/15/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Deepal did u update the AsyncMRs? Those need to change of course.
Also, looks like you broke the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2570?page=all ]
Saif Rizvi updated AXIS-2570:
-
Attachment: TestWithoutBug.jar
Classes generated as correctly complying to the request and response of the
wsdl where operation name is not same as the request elemen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2570?page=all ]
Saif Rizvi updated AXIS-2570:
-
Attachment: TestWithoutBug.wsdl
same wsdl with operation name made different with the request element.
this wsdl will generate correct classes.
corresponding classes a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2570?page=all ]
Saif Rizvi updated AXIS-2570:
-
Attachment: Test.jar
Jar of the classes generated by Axis WSDL2Java
> If the operation name is defined similar to the request element name in the
> wsdl schema type
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2570?page=all ]
Saif Rizvi updated AXIS-2570:
-
Attachment: Test.wsdl
wsdl to replicate the problem.
> If the operation name is defined similar to the request element name in the
> wsdl schema type then wsdl2java
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1380?page=comments#action_12442341 ]
Robert Luo commented on AXIS2-1380:
---
I can only find the 1.1 branch for the whole axis2 package not the plugin tool.
The Eclipse plugin is only available for 1.
If the operation name is defined similar to the request element name in the
wsdl schema type then wsdl2java generates incorrect classes.
Key: A
Deepal did u update the AsyncMRs? Those need to change of course.
Also, looks like you broke the Spring stuff; see the mail from Robert.
Sanjiva.
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 09:28 +0600, Thilina Gunarathne wrote:
> A quick comment...
>
> Did you test the Async message receivers... My instincts say the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1358?page=all ]
Roy A. Wood Jr. updated AXIS2-1358:
---
Attachment: MDQPatch1014.txt
This latest patch (MDQPatch1014) is the one to apply. The original patch
contains errors and should be discarded.
> Increas
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-598?page=all ]
Davanum Srinivas resolved AXIS2-598.
Resolution: Fixed
Michel,
the following fix for AXIS2-1359 should have fixed this problem as well. Please
test and let me know.
http://svn.apache.org/v
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1224?page=comments#action_12442327 ]
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS2-1224:
-
Deepal,
Just reviewed the code, MessageContext.getCurrentContext() should and will work
whatever the ServiceTCC
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1374?page=all ]
Davanum Srinivas resolved AXIS2-1374.
-
Resolution: Fixed
checked in a fix in neethi - svn revision 463986.
Sanka,
Please cross check.
thanks,
dims
> WSDL's with policy references cause t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1380?page=comments#action_12442315 ]
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS2-1380:
-
Nope. We changed the way (API's) to specify the authentication information. So
please check latest javadocs.
th
Yep.
-- dims
On 10/14/06, robert lazarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to clarify, what I believe Dims and I agreed to via +1 was to
remove all the spring jars from the war , and place just one 4K jar
inside the std-bin dist - axis2-spring*.jar - which has the axis2 code
to tie together spri
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1380?page=comments#action_12442310 ]
Robert Luo commented on AXIS2-1380:
---
Can I just simply replace the jar files that come with the Eclipse
plug-ins with those from the 1.1 branch?
Thanks,
Robert
Just to clarify, what I believe Dims and I agreed to via +1 was to
remove all the spring jars from the war , and place just one 4K jar
inside the std-bin dist - axis2-spring*.jar - which has the axis2 code
to tie together spring and axis2 .
Robert
On 10/14/06, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
And provide all aditional dependacncies of Axis2 as a one zip file
from the site. Or add a minmial standard and exteneded distribution.
I agree with Srinath in this. My guess is there would be users who
want everything and some would want most of it but not all. Right now
we have standard
Just looked at the std distribution .. we have
3 axom jars
10 Axis2 jars !!!
Lets bring them down to two jars .. Most of these axis2 jars are
small. So no harm putting everything in the one jar
I would say
1) Get rid of bcel-5.2.jar
2) jaxme-*
3) spring-*
And provide all aditional dependacnc
Couple of comments
1) Do we need JMS jar on minimal distribution? Plus we do not need jms
transport on the axis2.xml by default. users could uncomment and add a
jar if they need.
2) Can we make everything belong to Axis2 a one jar. At the time of
creating the distribution we could do that. Also
Hi Dennis,Build pass on both jks. It's just, I didn't have the latest jibx-bind and jibx-run jars. Thank youSaminda On 10/14/06, Dennis Sosnoski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I'm using JDK
1.5.0_07 on Mandriva Linux, so I very much doubt there areany JDK issues. :-) Are you sure you've cleaned every
I'm using JDK 1.5.0_07 on Mandriva Linux, so I very much doubt there are
any JDK issues. :-) Are you sure you've cleaned everything properly and
have everything synced to the repository? I made the checkins for this
test well a full day ago, and no one else appears to be having build
problems.
Hi,My bad.I did online build, and everything is fine now. Sorry for the confusion I've caused.Saminda On 10/14/06, Saminda Abeyruwan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,
I'm runing on java version "1.5.0_08"Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_08-b03), Ubuntu LinuxWill go to 1.4
Hi,I'm runing on java version "1.5.0_08"Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_08-b03), Ubuntu LinuxWill go to 1.4 and run the tests.Saminda
On 10/14/06, Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just confirmed that this test is working on my system, with currentsvn co
25 matches
Mail list logo
