Hi,
I have been using the "public void init()" method of my service implemenation
to perform one-time initialization. I can't remember how I stumbled across
this functionality, but it would be nice for you to define an implemenation
interface that describes this functionality. Maybe you have
Tony,
Yes, you are right. We need to clean this up. Could you please start
with a JIRA?
- I don't think we have an interface corresponding to the init.
- Yes, it is for every operation call.
- No, we don't have a destroy() AFAIK.
thanks,
dims
On 12/16/05, Tony Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Hi All,
The init functionality is part of the 'dependency injection' capability of the message receiver. It would be inappropriate to have an interface representing this since the service author is somewhat restricted if he is bound to an interface. It will also not be the proper dependency injecti
PMTo: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Re: [AXIS2] service implementation / clustering
Hi All,
The init functionality is part of the 'dependency injection' capability of
the message receiver. It would be inappropriate to have an interface
representing this since the serv
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:20 -0500, Tony Dean wrote:
> I was thinking of having something like J2EE ServiceLifecycle.
>
> public interface ServiceLifecycle
> {
>
> public abstract void init(Object obj)
> throws ServiceException;
>
> public abstract void destroy();
> }
>
> Suc
+1 and i got a feeling this would come handy when we are doing the WSRF stuff.
THanks
Chathura
On 12/17/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:20 -0500, Tony Dean wrote:
> > I was thinking of having something like J2EE ServiceLifecycle.
> >
> > public interfa
+1
On 12/16/05, Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 and i got a feeling this would come handy when we are doing the WSRF stuff.
> THanks
> Chathura
>
> On 12/17/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:20 -0500, Tony Dean wrote:
> > > I was thinki
Chathura Herath wrote:
+1 and i got a feeling this would come handy when we are doing the WSRF stuff.
THanks
Chathura
I already am doing WSRF stuff. So far: read only properties, single or bulk.
Later: WS-N.
I'm not sure I believe enough in the lifecycle bits to implement it, but
WS-N will f
