+1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
I would also like to see the memory leak fixed for a 1.4.1 release :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3870
How do we suggest bugs/fixes to be included in the 1.4.1 release ? In Jira ?
/hans
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Sanka Samaranayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>> - Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
>>> 18th (is that enough time, N
+1 for Nandana as the release manager.
/sumedha
+1 for Nandana as the release manager..
thanks,
Thilina
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Lahiru Sandakith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> +1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
>
> Regards
> Lahiru Sandakith
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Na
+1 for Nandana as the Release Manager
Regards
Lahiru Sandakith
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandana,
>
> +1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
>
> IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
> security change.
IMHO when it comes to .mar files we should version them as "x.yz"
In the case of 1.4.1 release the mar file versions can be: 1.41
This confirms to the module version constraints of Axis2.
Thanks,
Ruchith
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Saminda Abeyruwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys, Axis2
But it seems that we have done an Axis2 1.1.1 with adressing-1.1.1.mar and
soapmonitor-1.1.1.mar modules. Will this be a problem ?
thanks,
nandana
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Saminda Abeyruwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Guys, Axis2 module follow the version semantics of
>
> [major.minor]
Guys, Axis2 module follow the version semantics of
[major.minor]
Thus, having addressing-1.4.1.mar will cause problem in version resolution.
Am I making an absurd assumption here ?
Saminda
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hehe :)
>
> I was wonde
Hehe :)
I was wondering why did Glen tell that , I even went and read old mails :)
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Glen Daniels wrote:
|
| Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
| forever to get the release out?
|
| IMHO, a point release is for fixing cr
+1
Thank you!
Deepal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
<[EMAIL PROTECT
+1 for Nandana as the release manager.
Thanks,
Ruchith
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandana,
>
> +1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
>
> IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
> security change. Nothing m
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> - Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
>> 18th (is that enough time, Nandana?).
>
>
> I think we have to check Sanka's input on this. He will be fixing the
> maj
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
+1 for Nandana as the release manager
Nandana
I would also like to suggest
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3887 for inclusion, as this
prevents Synapse from using the servlet transport effectively, since it
Hi Glen,
- Let's aim to get 1.4.1 out the door at the end of next week, i.e. July
> 18th (is that enough time, Nandana?).
I think we have to check Sanka's input on this. He will be fixing the major
issue in policy.
- As always it's good to go through at least one RC so people can kick the
> ti
Two more things.
1) Obviously +1 to Nandana as RM, which I forgot to say explicitly. :)
2) To be crystal clear, my suggestion is to time-bound the release and
ONLY fix what can be finished in the allotted time, which should prevent
the slippery slope problem. If people want we can also switch
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Oh for crying out... sorry Dims!!! I was just reading a bunch of the
JIRA edits from Deepal (and haven't had coffee yet today). *blush*
--G
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s/Deepal/Dims/ ? :)
Glen Daniels wrote:
|
| Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
| forever to get the release out?
|
| IMHO, a point release is for fixing critical issues, and should not
| necessarily be limited to one p
Deepal, what are you so worried about, exactly? That it will take
forever to get the release out?
IMHO, a point release is for fixing critical issues, and should not
necessarily be limited to one particular issue. I think we should run
this basically just like a regular release but with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Exactly what i was afraid of :( Sigh! this is a *very* slippery slope.
- -- dims
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
| On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|> Nandana,
|>
|> +1 from me for you to be the Release Manager
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nandana,
>
> +1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
+ 1 from me.
>
>
> IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
> security change. Nothing more.
I think we need to fix any possi
Nandana,
+1 from me for you to be the Release Manager for 1.4.1
IMHO, we should use 1.4 branch. The *ONLY* change should be the
security change. Nothing more.
thanks,
dims
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to volunteer to be the
21 matches
Mail list logo