-1 as described.
Renaming the super class is an upward incompatibility that will break
every application that uses the built-in http support. If a rename is
to be done, it should be of the subclass.
The naming problem isn't quite as bad as it might otherwise seem since
the two classes are at lea
+1
On 10/8/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can we rename one? (The super class.)
Sanjiva.
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 23:27 -0400, Srinath Perera wrote:
> apprently a naming issue :)
>
> On 10/7/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > org.apache.axis2.transport.http.Si
Can we rename one? (The super class.)
Sanjiva.
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 23:27 -0400, Srinath Perera wrote:
> apprently a naming issue :)
>
> On 10/7/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > org.apache.axis2.transport.http.SimpleHTTPServer extends the other one
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> >
apprently a naming issue :)
On 10/7/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
org.apache.axis2.transport.http.SimpleHTTPServer extends the other one
-- dims
On 10/7/06, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> Axis2 source have two SimpleHTTPServer 's . Is it beocue o
org.apache.axis2.transport.http.SimpleHTTPServer extends the other one
-- dims
On 10/7/06, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All;
Axis2 source have two SimpleHTTPServer 's . Is it beocue one is
outdated, but not removed or is there a reson for having both?
org.apache.axis2.tra
Hi All;
Axis2 source have two SimpleHTTPServer 's . Is it beocue one is
outdated, but not removed or is there a reson for having both?
org.apache.axis2.transport.http.server.SimpleHttpServer
org.apache.axis2.transport.http.SimpleHTTPServer
Thanks
Srinath
--
Srinat
