Hi Chinthaka/Dims, This is the same Echo.aar service from the userguide, which had been included within test-resources in the old SAAJ implementation. May be we can simply add a note to the readme.txt file in the saaj test folder to use the Echo.aar from userguide, instead of duplicating the code in two places. What do you think?
Regards Azeez On 1/3/06, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Author: dims > >Date: Mon Jan 2 09:10:33 2006 > >New Revision: 365380 > > > >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=365380&view=rev > >Log: > >Patch from Azeez for doom > > > >================================ > >Here is a patch for handling SOAP 1.1 Fault Actors and SOAP 1.2 Fault > >Roles properly in DOOM. > > > >Earlier org.apache.axis2.soap.impl.dom.SOAPFaultRoleImpl which was > >being extended by SOAP11FaultRoleImpl & SOAP12FaultRoleImpl, was using > >"Role" as the localName, which was causing SOAP1.1 Fault Roles not to > >be handles properly. > > > >-- > >Thanks > >Afkham Azeez > > > > webservices/axis2/trunk/java/modules/saaj/test-resources/Echo.aar > > > > > > > Do you think its a good idea to put .aar files in to the test-resources > file ? I know its easier, but see this as if u've put a .class file. I > think its better if you can put a pre-goal to create this aar file when > you run maven. This is safer since code may change overtime. > Is there is a good reason to keep this as an aar file itself ? > > -- Chinthaka > -- Thanks Afkham Azeez -- Thanks Afkham Azeez
