|
Hi Edward, I think this isn’t a bad idea. Is
it worth the effort? You could just build a facade/proxy class that would
accomplish the same thing, no?
From: Edward Slattery
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This may be a dumb question, but it isn't my first. I was trying to deploy a web service which has several different
functionalities exposed to different users. I thought the way to do this would be to define several interfaces, and have my service implement
them all, then define in the wsdd file each exposed set of functionality as a different service. I.E I have interfaces called AccountsManagement and
AccountsLogging. My AccountsService implements them both. I was hoping to say: <service name="AccountsLogging"
provider="java:RPC"> <service name="AccountsManagement"
provider="java:RPC"> ... where the allowedMethods values are Interfaces, not method names. I can see I could list all the methods of each interface as
allowedMethods, but was wondering if it would make sense to add the capacity to maybe specify value="interface:InterfaceName" to the
allowedMethods? |
