I know ;-)
The question was having the specify two different version numbers for
addressing module and Axis2 in a RC1 release
Chamikara
On 7/11/07, Ruchith Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm .. I think since the value just has to be a long value there's
another way to fix this :-)
Try
Hmm .. I think since the value just has to be a long value there's
another way to fix this :-)
Try using 1.21 if it is a version after 1.2
Thanks,
Ruchith
On 7/7/07, Chamikara Jayalath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
AFAIK the version number of a module must be a long value. I.e we
Agreed, having different values for the modules is just asking for trouble.
David
On 07/07/07, Chamikara Jayalath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
AFAIK the version number of a module must be a long value. I.e we cannot
have a module with a name such as addressing-1.3-RC1.mar. This seems
True. It was a quick fix to get RC1 out.
/sumedha
On 7/7/07, David Illsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed, having different values for the modules is just asking for
trouble.
David
On 07/07/07, Chamikara Jayalath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
AFAIK the version number of a module must
Hi,
Can you explain why we need separate version number for the mar files please?
Thanks.
David
On 06/07/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sumedha
Date: Fri Jul 6 07:35:53 2007
New Revision: 553898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=553898
Log:
added properties
