Re: WSIF proposal

> What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is > some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an I don't agree that Axis is a brand for Apache Web services! Axis as created as the Apache SOAP replacement project and I continue to support it

RE: [BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with MSVC++.Net)

Alexander - IMHO, the WSDL issue is a .NET problem to solve. The fact that you can hack a parseable WSDL definition doesn't prove correctness. Correctness is defined based on interpretation of the base specification and underlying XML schema. Can you show us in the WSDL specification [1] wher

RE: [BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with MSVC++.Net)

I would disagree. Correcting the WSDL to reflect the SOAP messages in a way that is consistent fixes the problem. There is also the new beta 2 issue that you are not responding to. The namespace definitions for the operation bindings are no longer the same between input and output messages.

RE: [BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with MSVC++.Net)

I believe this is a .NET problem. I understand the naming rules are as follows: If the part references a simple type, the name of the part is used for the SOAP:Body element name. If the part references a complex type, the names of the children of the complexType are used as the SOAP:Body elemen

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava Emitter.java

scheu 02/05/15 14:47:44 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl Java2WSDL.java java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/fromJava Emitter.java Log: Changed Java2WSDL --stopClasses, --methods, and --exclude to allow duplicate option settings. Revision ChangesPath 1.1

Re: WSIF proposal

If it has its own cvs tree then it seems odd to have "axis" in the name. It doesn't really matter much to me as long as the names are consistent, either they both have "axis" or neither do. -Dug "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 03:11:41 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8631] - Axis functional test failure with JDK 1.4

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/gen WSDL2.java

scheu 02/05/15 13:22:01 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl Java2WSDL.java WSDL2Java.java java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/gen WSDL2.java Log: Changed the Java2WSDL class to have similar structure and flow as WSDL2Java. Added method comments to Java2WSDL, WSD

Re: Abstract class

Did you mean Java2WSDL generates the wrong binding ? Please clarify.   thanks, Rich Scheuerle XML & Web Services Development 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115) Anukool Rege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/15/2002 10:43 AM Please respond to axis-dev                 To:        "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"

Re: WSIF proposal

We can mirror Avalon and its sub-projects concept for a broader view of Axis +1 for xml-axis-wsif as cvs tree. +1 for org.apache.axis.wsif.* (I can go with org.apache.wsif.* too if pushed). Thanks, dims --- Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dug > > What do you think? I proposed

Re: WSIF proposal

Sounds like a good idea. Paul - Original Message - From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:08 PM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > Personally, I'm not sure there is a lot of synergy between the XML and Web > services activities. IMHO

Re: WSIF proposal

Dims I like the offer, but I really want to get my team working in the open source community. So what I want to do is get the CVS tree running, get the nightly builds running (and probably breaking), fix up the breaks, etc. If you can hold off a day or two, perhaps we can get the code up in its o

Re: WSIF proposal

Dug What do you think? I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that there is some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't really an XML project (it can call non-xml systems) and it isnt really a sub-project of Axis as it is today. In a way I'd rather see a number of web serv

Re: WSIF proposal

Personally, I'm not sure there is a lot of synergy between the XML and Web services activities. IMHO, they are different communities. Though the Web services stuff will build on the XML stuff, I do see value in separating the Web services stuff into it's own community. Perhaps http://webser

Re: WSIF proposal

- Original Message - From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:14 AM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons? > > > > and does it contain a sandbox to mirror jaka

Re: WSIF proposal

On Wed, 15 May 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > More deeply, I'm wondering if xml and web services are emerging as > separate communities. They are just as close as TCP is to HTTP, or HTTP to SOAP - one uses the other.. but really - is there synergy between a nail and a hammer. Though sold in the same s

Re: WSIF proposal

Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons? > > and does it contain a sandbox to mirror jakarta-commons/sandbox? Not yet. More deeply, I'm wondering if xml and web services are emerging as separate communities. - Sam Ruby

Re: WSIF proposal

- Original Message - From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 10:23 AM Subject: Re: WSIF proposal > Steve Loughran wrote: > > > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons? > and does it contain a sandbox to mirror jakarta-com

[BUG] Beta2 interop (was RE: Interoperability issue with MSVC++.Net)

Hi all, I know you all have a very busy schedule but nobody has acknowledged this message in the past few days and I am wondering if it was noticed. I believe there is an interoperability issue here with respect to clients written using VC++.Net. If you need additional info I can provide anything

Re: WSIF proposal

Steve Loughran wrote: > > Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons? Yes. - Sam Ruby

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/lib commons-logging.jar commons-logging.LICENSE

rsitze 02/05/15 10:12:17 Modified:java/lib commons-logging.jar commons-logging.LICENSE Log: Newest commons-logging. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +93 -211 xml-axis/java/lib/commons-logging.jar <> 1.2 +59 -49xml-axis/java/lib/commons-loggi

Re: Architecture proposals for face-to-face

- Original Message - From: "Russell Butek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 7:54 AM Subject: Architecture proposals for face-to-face > Folks, here's a document that we (IBM) were planning to present at the > face-to-face next week. Since we're n

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java

scheu 02/05/15 10:02:53 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java Log: When a XMLUtils.newDocument creates an InputSource it should close the streams after they are used. Revision ChangesPath 1.49 +9 -1 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils/XM

Re: WSIF proposal

Is there an xml-commons to mirror jakarta-commons? I was wondering, not only because this WSIF could start off there, but because as I was thinking of looking at how hard it would be to write some .NET code to work with Java hash tables, and it doesnt make sense to put that into jakarta-commons,

Re: WSIF proposal

Paul, In the interest of time, do you want to send me the updated code? I can place it in the proposal directory as i did before (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-axis/java/proposal/) Thanks, dims --- Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks > > We have done the updates to WSIF

Re: happiness test for axis

- Original Message - From: "Glyn Normington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:52 AM Subject: Re: happiness test for axis > > Steve, > > I don't know why other committers didn't pick this up. If you're > interested, I didn't pick it up firstly b

Re: WSIF proposal

If the package name is org.apache.wsif (not org.apache.axis.wsif) why would the tree be named xml-axis-wsif instead of just xml-wsif? -Dug "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/15/2002 10:30:04 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject:WSIF proposal

Abstract class

I have an abstract class in one of the methods signature- placeOrder (Security in0, quantity in1, tradeType in2, price in3) where Security is an abstract class. The concrete classes that extend Securities are Stock, Bond and Mutual Fund. I have noticed that the WSDL2Java generated bindings alway

Architecture proposals for face-to-face

Folks, here's a document that we (IBM) were planning to present at the face-to-face next week. Since we're not going to make it, I'll present it here. The intent of this thing is to get us all on the same page with respect to how we proceed with AXIS development. It is intended to be a living d

WSIF proposal

Folks   We have done the updates to WSIF to get it to work with Axis beta 2. We are still working on the build changes to make the build more modular.   I would like to set up a CVS tree to post this work, and so we can post this and carry on the build work in the public space.   To do thi

RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/multibinding VerifyFilesT estCase.java

INTERFACE_NAME: +1 Silly JAX-RPC using cryptic TLA's, they should be MIA IMHO. -- Tom -Original Message- From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 4:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/multibinding VerifyFilesT

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/docs architecture-guide.html

glyn02/05/15 06:03:57 Modified:java/docs architecture-guide.html Log: Add archaeological findings about event recorders dug out by Greg Truty. Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +10 -2 xml-axis/java/docs/architecture-guide.html Index: architecture-guide.html =

Axis is only for SOAP-RPC?

Hello. I have interest in Axis for my project which is B2B messaging framework. So I am designing the architecture that Server is SOAP server and client is SOAP client. 1. SOAP client send business documents to server and SOAP Server processes the documents 2. SOAP client receive documents from S

[GUMP] Build timed out - Axis

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. Last

Re: Purpose of SAX event recorders

Sam's suggestion that SAX event recorders were introduced to help with deferred deserialization seems the most plausible suggestion so far, regardless of whether or not they are still required along with 'fixup' deserializers. Glen: are you aware of any other reason that SAX event recorders may h

Re: happiness test for axis

Steve, I don't know why other committers didn't pick this up. If you're interested, I didn't pick it up firstly because I didn't notice it (while processing a 5 day backlog of axis-dev activity after being out of the office), possibly because it didn't say [PATCH] or similar in the title. Now t