DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9452] New: - Error deploying Axis on J2ee Deploytool 1.3.1 Server.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils tcpmon.java

rineholt02/05/27 17:51:18 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils tcpmon.java Log: Fix to state change . Revision ChangesPath 1.36 +4 -4 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils/tcpmon.java Index: tcpmon.java ==

too many "inactive" committers

I sense that there's concern that there are too many inactive committers on axis-dev. I'm definitely one of the culprits. I volunteer to become a non- committer to help reduce the "deadwood." Can someone please "de-committerize" me? Hopefully having fewer inactive committers will help get more "

Re: Request for new Apache ID's and new CVS Module

Brian, Can you please let us know about "Request #2" below? thanks, dims --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've completed steps 1&3 below. > > - Sam Ruby > > > Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/24/2002 02:17:11 PM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To:[EMAIL P

RE: soap:header new implementation

Glen, Has there been any discussion about soap:header support in last week's chat? Sylvain. -Original Message- From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:28 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: soap:header new implementation Hi Sylvain! First of

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

Sam beat me to it. Rich Scheuerle XML & Web Services Development 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) R J Scheuerle

HELP - Basic install of Axis on Web Server Resin 2.1.0.

I'm having a problem with the basic install of Axis on Web Server Resin 2.1.0. The problem is shown below.Could someone help me?José Airton.[EMAIL PROTECTED]500 Servlet Exceptionorg.apache.axis.InternalException: org.apache.axis.ConfigurationException:org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDExc

RE: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities...

Title: RE: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities... Sorry for the comment, it was not intended as a general criticism. Please note that I'm not an Apache committer, and so my opinions are those of an outsider. I will requote myself to explain it better: > The true strength of the

Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

Can an axis committer please change in xml-axis/java/samples/security/SignedSOAPEnvelope.java canonicalMessage = c14n.canonicalizeDocument(doc); to canonicalMessage = c14n.canonicalizeSubtree(doc); ^^^ I remov

[GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml setenv: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/jakarta/x

RE: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities...

Alex, I would be grateful if you could spell out why you think Apache Axis 'sucks'? As an Axis committer I am aware of some major deficiencies, but perhaps you had other things in mind. Please copy axis-dev on your reply as I'm sure the other developers would welcome specific criticisms. Thanks,

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils tcpmon.java tcpmon.properties

rineholt02/05/27 05:16:48 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils tcpmon.java tcpmon.properties Log: Treat both streams equitably in determining connection life. Change thread handling-- should require no sleeps. Revision ChangesPath 1.35 +591 -432 xml-axis/java/

RE: [PROPOSAL] Committer access and responsibilities...

Seen on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note the last paragraph. - Sam Ruby -- Forwarded by Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM on 05/27/2002 06:20 AM --- "Fernandez Martinez, Alejandro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/27/2002 06:10:09 AM Please respond to "Jakarta General List" <[EM

java.util.Date serialization

I use dynamic proxy calls. A Date variable is serialized (default) as xsd:date (time is truncated). The problems: 1) The value of the variable is not the same before serialization and after serialization. 2) Complience with JAX-RPC 0.9 specification. (chapter 5.3.2) The mapping for simple java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9436] New: - RCPProvider.java does not use invokeMethod() anymore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu