Re: Axis Re-architecture

- Original Message - From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 16:46 Subject: Re: Axis Re-architecture > . Essentially what Glyn > would like to do is set up a sandbox that can be used to experiment with > various architectural impr

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

While it may not be explicit, its definitely required. Otherwise the lifecycle model of design-time and run-time doesn't work, for example. Same goes for Beans.instantiate() .. (see section 10.3 of the Beans spec ftp://ftp.javasoft.com/docs/beans/beans.101.pdf). Since Eduardo co-wrote the "how to

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

Well, I think it's more good programming practice as there is nothing explicitely in the java bean spec about this... However... there is also the following reference... http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/docs/goodbean.pdf which states... Two rules implied by the JavaBeans architecture but t

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: >+1 .. beans can only have no-args constructors; otherwise it breaks >the entire programming model they espouse. > > Do you have a definative reference for this? I see nothing in the spec that requires this, and conflicting information out on the web. In particular

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

+1 .. beans can only have no-args constructors; otherwise it breaks the entire programming model they espouse. Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:03 AM Subject: TCK issue: beans with full constructors? > The TCK

[WSIF] WSDL4J

I'm reading in the list archive that a patched version of wsdl4j is being used with wsif. Where is that? Perhaps a better question would be, is there an ETA for when wsif will be synced up with the latest version of wsdl4j? Thanks, Peter

Re: Axis Re-architecture

After speaking with Glyn, I think (my opinion only) perhaps the language used to describe what he wants to do was a bit to strong. Basically, while functional, Axis suffers from a lack of a strong architectural backbone that makes it somewhat difficult for someone just coming into the project

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The TCK requires generated beans to have full constructors. > ... > 2. JAX-RPC itself does not explicitly require it. Based on discussions that we had last week, my guess is that Eduardo would be of the opinion that a RI itself should *NOT* emit such constructors. E

Re: Axis Re-architecture

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:26 PM Subject: Re: Axis Re-architecture > On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Glyn Normington wrote: > > > Costin: I'm aiming more at a radical re-architecting rather than a > > re-factoring. My goa

Re: TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

+1 - James M Snell/Fresno/IBM Web services architecture and strategy Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM 544.9035 TIE line 559.587.1233 Office 919.486.0077 Voice Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN 0596000952 == Have I

TCK issue: beans with full constructors?

The TCK requires generated beans to have full constructors. In other words, if a bean has properties int x; String y; then you must have a constructor Bean(int x, String y); We DO NOT have a full constructor in axis for a number of reasons. I believe the TCK SHOULD NOT require the full constr

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/types ComprehensiveTypes.wsdl

butek 2002/06/13 15:36:23 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/toJava JavaEnumTypeWriter.java java/test/wsdl/types ComprehensiveTypes.wsdl Log: TCK found a bug. Literal integral strings from XML can make their way to Java enum classes. If these strings are lon

Re: Where do build/work/test/wsdl/multibinding/*Skeleton.java files comefrom?

The WSDL2Java command should have the skeletonDeploy flag set to true for the multibinding test. Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Where do build/work/test/wsdl/multibinding/*Skeleton.java files come from? The tests have

Where do build/work/test/wsdl/multibinding/*Skeleton.java files come from?

The tests have changed since I started working on my restructuring. Now, I am getting a test.wsdl.multibinding.VerifyFilesTestCase error. I have found that I am missing some files in the above path, but cannot for the life of me figure out WHERE these files come from. Anyone have an idea? Matt

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java

rsitze 2002/06/13 12:44:24 Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java Log: Remove unnecessary test. Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +0 -6 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java Index: TestXMLUtils.java =

Re: Axis Re-architecture

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Glyn Normington wrote: > Costin: I'm aiming more at a radical re-architecting rather than a > re-factoring. My goal is not primarily to preserve the current function as > some of this is there by accident of the current structure. I was afraid of that... If I remember corec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9848] New: - Compatibility problems between AXIS and WASP

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client Call.java

dims2002/06/13 12:23:15 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/client Call.java Log: Set a default for portTypeName Revision ChangesPath 1.135 +5 -5 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client/Call.java Index: Call.java ===

Re: is it Web Service, or web service, or Web service

Web services. Steve Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] (919)254-0615 (T/L 444) Emerging Technologies James M Snell/Fresno/IBM@IBMUS James M Snell/Fresno/IBM@IBMUS 06/12/2002 08:25 PM Please respond to axis-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: is it Web Service, o

Re: JAX-RPC TCK - problem with ServiceFactory.createService

dims fixed my problem (thanks, dims!). My comments are still mostly legitimate (I'll fix them momentarily), that the user still has to fill in a lot of the info himself, but the TCK DOES do that, so we should let him. Now 23 out of the 29 Call tests pass! (and there was much rejoicing...) Russe

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client ServiceFactory.java

butek 2002/06/13 11:47:42 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/client ServiceFactory.java Log: Clean up the comments on ServiceFactory.createService. Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +5 -9 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client/ServiceFactory.java Index: Service

Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java

Sam, I did not want to eliminate the unit testcase since i thought rsitze might want to add something else there. I just commented it out so that Gump (and my all-tests) would not fail. Thanks, dims --- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the

Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java

Ouch. Caught me. *** Richard A. Sitze[EMAIL PROTECTED] CORBA Interoperability & WebServices IBM WebSphere Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/2002 12:19 PM Please respond to axis-dev To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/docs developers-guide.html install.html

dims2002/06/13 11:22:41 Modified:java axis.properties build.xml java/docs developers-guide.html install.html Added: java/lib log4j-1.2.4.LICENSE log4j-1.2.4.jar Removed: java/lib log4j-core.jar log4j-core.LICENSE Log: Updating to latest log4j, si

Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java

This seems silly. Why not remove the method from the unit test case entirely? >dims2002/06/13 10:19:43 > > Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java > Log: > comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-) > > Revision ChangesPath >

Re: Is axis client thread safe?(with patch)

Richard A. Sitze wrote: > > Is the first unnecessary because of the implementation of saxFactory, > or because the spec was changed to mandate that it be thread-safe? It is because the one reference to the private, static saxFactory object (beyond the class initialization which is guaranteed t

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java

dims2002/06/13 10:19:43 Modified:java/test/utils TestXMLUtils.java Log: comment initDOMFactory as rsitze renamed it to getDOMFactory AND made it private :-) Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -2 xml-axis/java/test/utils/TestXMLUtils.java Index: TestXMLUtils.

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client Service.java

dims2002/06/13 10:14:53 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/client Service.java Log: Allow createCall to instantiate a Call object even when WSDL is not specified. Revision ChangesPath 1.56 +6 -4 xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/client/Service.java Inde

Java2WSDL with multiple portType

When generating WSDL from java using Java2WSDL, is there a way to generate a single WSDL file for multiple portTypeName or class-of-portType? Currently, Java2WSDL seems to allow only one portTypeName to be specified. If org.apache.axis.wsdl.fromJava.Emitter is modified to process multiple port

Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java

Richard, TestXMLUtils has a reference to initDOMFactory. Can you please clean it up as you think fit? Did you run "all-tests"? Thanks, dims --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rsitze 2002/06/13 06:33:04 > > Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java > Log: > Patch suppli

Re: JAX-RPC TCK - problem with ServiceFactory.createService

dims, here's the extra info you asked for. Pretty basic. The client code is calling: service = JAXRPC_Util.getService(SERVICE_QNAME); call = service.createCall(PORT_QNAME); JAXRPC_Util.getService looks like: if(sfactory == null) sfactory = ServiceFactory.newInstance(); Service

Re: JAX-RPC TCK - problem with ServiceFactory.createService

Hi Russell!   What arguments get passed to each method, exactly?   (note : I may not be able to continue this after about T+10 min from now as our meeting is wrapping up for the day - on again tomorrow tho!)   --G - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

JAX-RPC TCK - problem with ServiceFactory.createService

The TCK depends on ServiceFactory.createService(QName serviceName). I've included our implementation below. Notice 2 things: - The javadoc comment says "Not yet implemented". There IS an implementation, but it's not much more than a placeholder. - My comments inline ("RJB" is me) say I don't kno

Re: Axis Re-architecture

More background worth reading: http://www.x180.net/Mutterings/Apache/rules.html

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9780] - Attachments Error serializing DataHandlers that are not backed by FileDataSource

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java

rsitze 2002/06/13 06:33:04 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/utils XMLUtils.java Log: Patch supplied by Takashi Okamoto to correct thread unsafe access to DocumentationBuilderFactory. Eliminate (redundant!) side-effect in initDOMFactory, rename to getDOMFactory, and ma

Re: Is axis client thread safe?(with patch)

Is the first unnecessary because of the implementation of saxFactory, or because the spec was changed to mandate that it be thread-safe? *** Richard A. Sitze[EMAIL PROTECTED] CORBA Interoperability & WebServices IBM WebSphere Development Sam Rub

[GUMP] Build Failure - Axis

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml setenv: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/jakarta/x

Re: [WSIF] Dependency on JROM

Title: JROM - Registration process Dims   We understand this is an issue, but we didn't want to hold up the open sourcing of WSIF for it. We are working on some options to solve this.   Paul     - Original Message - From: Davanum Srinivas To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: W

Re: Axis Re-architecture

Costin: I'm aiming more at a radical re-architecting rather than a re-factoring. My goal is not primarily to preserve the current function as some of this is there by accident of the current structure. All: I agree that 1.0 should be shipped before any re-architecture finds its way into the main