RE: Style=document over RPC ?

2002-11-22 Thread Douglas Bitting
In your first case, that would seem to imply a Message style operation, not Document. In the second case, that would seem to imply "bad" design. :-) -Original Message- From: Vidyanand Murunikkara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Su

RE: Style=document over RPC ?

2002-11-22 Thread Vidyanand Murunikkara
I am not an expert either. But the soap:body could be a set of document fragments and not neccesarily a single document. check this http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwebsr v/html/wsdlexplained.asp. Correct me if I am wrong. And also what if there is more than one m

Async Support

2002-11-22 Thread Kameshwar Jayaraman
Hi folks, What is the current stand of Axis to support Async support? The one that is in the sample seems like a un-intutive way to get Async messaging and the one in the proposal area sound like a good one. Can some one tell me what is the future for the Async support and how will it be used

RE: Style=document over RPC ?

2002-11-22 Thread Douglas Bitting
As near as I can tell, document based operations are discovered based on the type of the parameter. That is, if a comes in, and is mapped to foo.PurchaseOrder, the method that is invokes is that which has the single argument of type foo.PurchaseOrder. Seems like a perfectly valid approach sin

Style=document over RPC ?

2002-11-22 Thread Vidyanand Murunikkara
Hi folks There has been some heated discussions in axis-user over rpc style or document style recently which basically started off with someone asking if they could use a WSDL with document style and the Axis server would use RPCProvider to do all the XML <-> Java Binding. So for anyone outside i

Re: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread Scott Nichol
The test cases only get run if you have junit. There are other similar conditional builds: look at various .present stuff. You've got some real ant-philes on this project ;-). I'm trying to learn through voyeurism. Scott Nichol - Original Message - From: "David Chappell" <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread Scott Nichol
It's because AxisTestBase.java was only recently added. There was a very brief discussion of whether it should be in the "mainline" code or with test code. I'm not a committer on this project, but I would say its dependence on junit would be a good reason to say it belongs in the test code. Scot

Re: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread David Chappell
Hhmmm.After seeing all the junit tests that now get run...I guess I did need it. Apparently the build used to pass without it? Dave David Chappell wrote: > > Beats me. I just went and downloaded junit.jar and put it in my > classpath and I'm past that error. I never needed that before. >

Re: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
fixed in CVS. - Original Message - From: "David Chappell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:30 PM Subject: Re: junit.framework.TestCase? > Beats me. I just went and downloaded junit.jar and put it in my > classpath and I'm past that error.

cvs commit: xml-axis/java build.xml

2002-11-22 Thread stevel
stevel 2002/11/22 13:46:14 Modified:java build.xml Log: excluding another file that needs junit Revision ChangesPath 1.214 +1 -0 xml-axis/java/build.xml Index: build.xml === RCS file: /

Re: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread David Chappell
Beats me. I just went and downloaded junit.jar and put it in my classpath and I'm past that error. I never needed that before. Hh.. Dave Vidyanand Murunikkara wrote: > > Looks like you need the junit.jar .Wonder how I didnt run into this. > > Vidyanand. > > -Original Message

RE: junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread Vidyanand Murunikkara
Looks like you need the junit.jar .Wonder how I didnt run into this. Vidyanand. -Original Message- From: David Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: junit.framework.TestCase? Its been a couple of weeks since I have re

RE: Building Axis - Can someone check in this for me.

2002-11-22 Thread Vidyanand Murunikkara
Done. Finally can check in :) Thanks Vidyanand. -Original Message- From: Robert Sauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: AW: Building Axis - Can someone check in this for me. There is a bug in the doc stating recommended Jav

junit.framework.TestCase?

2002-11-22 Thread David Chappell
Its been a couple of weeks since I have refreshed from cvs and tried to build I am getting this compile error. Do I need another jar file? compile: [javac] Compiling 586 source files to C:\Work\AxisBuilds\xml-axis\java\build \classes [javac] C:\Work\AxisBuilds\xml-axis\java\src\org\ap

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding DefaultTypeMappingImpl.java

2002-11-22 Thread dims
dims2002/11/22 12:12:26 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis Constants.java java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding DefaultTypeMappingImpl.java Log: Fix for Bug 14712, we need to map xml:lang to org.apache.axis.types.Language as well. Revision

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jca WSIFResource_JCA_zh.properties WSIFResource_JCA_es.properties WSIFResource_JCA_pt_BR.properties WSIFResource_JCA_de.properties WSIFResource_JCA_ko.properties WSIFResource_JCA_ja.properties WSIFResource_JCA_zh_TW.properties WSIFResource_JCA_it.properties WSIFResource_JCA_fr.properties

2002-11-22 Thread piotrp
piotrp 2002/11/22 12:11:43 Added: java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jca WSIFResource_JCA_zh.properties WSIFResource_JCA_es.properties WSIFResource_JCA_pt_BR.properties WSIFResource_JCA_de.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14712] - wsdl2java can not do standard s and does not support xml:lang and xsi:schemaLocation

2002-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jca WSIFResource_JCA_zh_TW.properties WSIFResource_JCA_de.properties WSIFResource_JCA_ko.properties WSIFResource_JCA_pt_BR.properties WSIFResource_JCA_ja.properties WSIFResource_JCA_it.properties WSIFResource_JCA_fr.properties WSIFResource_JCA_zh.properties WSIFResource_JCA_es.properties

2002-11-22 Thread piotrp
piotrp 2002/11/22 12:11:03 Added: java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/jca Tag: pre1_2_0-patches WSIFResource_JCA_zh_TW.properties WSIFResource_JCA_de.properties WSIFResource_JCA_ko.properties

Re: extension to java2WSDL ant task

2002-11-22 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Arno de Quaasteniet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:48 AM Subject: extension to java2WSDL ant task >P.S. Is there any documentation on the ant tasks? docs/ant

Re: extension to java2WSDL ant task

2002-11-22 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Arno, Looks interesting...Can you please open a bug report in Bugzilla for this? http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla. Thanks, dims --- Arno de Quaasteniet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was playing around a bit with the axis ant tasks and mist something... > The attached patch allows use

extension to java2WSDL ant task

2002-11-22 Thread Arno de Quaasteniet
Hi, I was playing around a bit with the axis ant tasks and mist something... The attached patch allows users to use a classpath tag in the java2WSDL ant task, in which the task should search for java classes it needs to generate the WSDL from. For example:

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/java WSIFOperation_Java.java

2002-11-22 Thread owenb
owenb 2002/11/22 07:56:36 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/ejb WSIFOperation_EJB.java java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/java WSIFOperation_Java.java Log: When parts are null in the input message, and the ser

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/java WSIFOperation_Java.java

2002-11-22 Thread owenb
owenb 2002/11/22 07:55:03 Modified:java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/ejb Tag: pre1_2_0-patches WSIFOperation_EJB.java java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/java Tag: pre1_2_0-patches WSIFOperation_Java.java Log: When part

[GUMP] Build timed out - Axis security

2002-11-22 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. L

[GUMP] Build timed out - Axis

2002-11-22 Thread Sam Ruby
This email is autogenerated from the output from: Build results exceed maximum length. Please see URL above for details. Last 50 li

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14712] - wsdl2java can not do standard s and does not support xml:lang and xsi:schemaLocation

2002-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/symbolTable SymbolTable.java

2002-11-22 Thread dims
dims2002/11/22 06:38:54 Modified:java/src/org/apache/axis/wsdl/symbolTable SymbolTable.java Log: Fix for Bug 14712 - wsdl2java can not do standard s and does not support xml:lang and xsi:schemaLocation Revision ChangesPath 1.52 +18 -1 xml-axis/java/src/org/

cvs commit: xml-axis-wsif/java/src/org/apache/wsif/util/jms JMS2HTTPBridge.java

2002-11-22 Thread antelder
antelder2002/11/22 01:52:19 Modified:java/test/docStyle NWBankTest.java ZipCodeAxisTest.java java/test/docStyle/wsifservice nwBank.wsdl zipCodeResolver.wsdl java/src/org/apache/wsif/providers/soap/apacheaxis WS

AW: Building Axis - Can someone check in this for me.

2002-11-22 Thread Robert Sauer
There is a bug in the doc stating recommended Java Mail Version is 1.0.2. Guess it should be 1.3. Just feels too small to make a patch out of it. Ciao, Robert > Thanks for looking into this Scott. > > Even I have no idea as to who updates these permissions. I have sent a > mail to [EMAIL PROTEC