Sounds good, +1
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 27/01/2003 15:44:04
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"a
Sounds ok, +1 from me.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 22/01/2003 17:04:58
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"a
back level branch, and four +1 votes to
having an RC2 based off head of stream later in the week when some bugs
have been resolved.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes"
which I'd like that to happen this
week, so it would good to for that to also be in RC2.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 20/0
ople can
report problems - new bugzilla bugs - and we then decide if it the problem
should be fixed and included in the final release?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Aleksander Slominski &l
Reposting 1 last time just in case anyone knows anything about using
attachments with operationStyle of "message" and can offer any comments.
Thanks,
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248
example if there's a security problem?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Nirmal Mukhi/Watson/IBM@IBMUS on 18/12/2002 16:45:49
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROT
826390751.1040143576812
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-ID: <829847775.1040143576812.apache-soap.55n405h>
The owl and the pussy cat went to sea in a beautiful pea-green boat,
--=_Part_424_826390751.1040143576812--
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
#x27;s looked at an xxx2WSDL tool yet.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/12/2002 20:05:35
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"
anything the WSIF people can do to help get something like
ws.apache.org/wsif to happen?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@main.gmane.org> on 10/12/2002
doing this in the time frame of this
release?
Thanks,
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/12/2002 15:18:49
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTE
+1 from me for http://xml.apache.org/wsif.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeremy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/12/2002 17:53:27
Please respond to [EMAI
have the
user do the compile themselves like WSDL2Java does?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
istically this would probably have to be post 2.0
work.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/12/2002 11:03:12
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PR
e to have a bugzilla
review on IRC soon). I'm not sure if we can fix this for this release
though.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Aleksander Slominski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/1
I like http://xml.apache.org/wsif better, and as we'd like to move WSIF out
of AXIS some day wouldn't it be better to start off here from the start?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248
ns to this? As we all seem to be commiters to
xml-site can we just create new directories in xml-site/targets/ or would
that upset someone or break something?
Thanks,
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x2
ate task to try to do this for the 2.0 release?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/12/2002 12:04:29
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
meeting we can try to come up with the a final list of achievable items for
this release.
All are welcome, sorry about the short notice, I'll post a log to axis-dev
afterwards for those who can't make it..
The WSIF channel is on Undernet - irc.undernet.org, channel wsif.
...an
;t know why you're seeing this now, something to do with BSF
recently moving to Apache? I'll look at tiding this up tomorrow now you've
brought it up. I still think compiled messages could offer performance
improvements one day, if we can find a way to implement it right
...
e with
which you can migrate from say Apache SOAP 2.3 to Apache AXIS, or any other
future SOAP API .
You can find out more about WSIF at
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/xml-axis-wsif/java/readme.htm
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laborat
wsif.nsf) for questions. I've asked
alphaWorks to update the WSIF page to point to Apache but it hasn't happen
yet.
I encourage you to keep on using it, as far as I know there is nothing else
available that has similar functionality.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED
gs you require. Making these
tools more WSIF friendly is something we still need to do.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 30/10/2002 15:31:20
Please respond to [EMAIL
ords
=&keywords_type=anywords&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0
=&cmdtype=doit&order=%27Importance%27
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
look
and run the samples?
What do people think?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
added functionality that wsif should be using
now?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CICS/390 Change Team
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/10/2002 01:23:38
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
it - looks like the WSIFPort_Java does do this now. Which provider were
you testing to get the performance increases?
Be great if some of the others could comment on this, I know Owen has done
some performance work on caching of various things...
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web
on't have so much
time to check, but things like JMS properties and the context could end up
with residual data. There's also the providers that others have written
that we don't have control over. Isn't it safer to let the WSIFPort decide
if it wants to cache and reuse a WSIFOp
A small change to the below proposal:
To match with the existing WSIF usage of the context message I think the
order of choosing the timeout values should be:
1 - WSDL jms:property
2 - WSIF context message
3 - WSDL jms:propertyValue
4 - wsif.properties
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL
Ok, as there hasn't been any objections if I don't hear anything today I'll
commit this change.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
"Jeff Greif" <[EMAIL PRO
jms:property tag defined
with the name of the WSIFConstants timeout string then use that value for
the timeout,
otherwise get the default timeout from wsif.properties as it does now.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
me()
method for null or "", find the operation style, and implement the
algorithm in 2.4.5. I don't think WSIF should be doing this.
It seems better for now to let some rare cases of slightly invalid WSDL
through as valid, than to have strictly correct WSDL be rejected.
498)
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 01/10/2002 13:47:11
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [axis] WSDL2J
well.
...
...
Kind Regards
DK
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
So Jeff can get past the problem, if I don't hear otherwise from anyone
I'll commit this later today and change the AXIS provider to use it.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
even when param is null.
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
fer smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 28/09/2002 16:27:56
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
. If there was a
new WSDL2WSIF command, would it be part of AXIS or WSIF?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
Russell Butek/Austin/IBM@IBMUS on 30/09/2002 15:08:43
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTE
es.
If we made this change, say adding a -w switch to WSDL2Java and all the
other associated changes to do this, would this be considered for adding to
the standard AXIS WSDL2Java?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01
uplicate operation in binding: " +
bop.getName() +
":" + inName +
":" + outName );
}
}
}
}
return choosenOp;
}
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED
using null for the input/output names, and then if still
no match is then found check to see if the binding input/output names for
the matched operation are null. If they are then use that bindingOperation.
If not then return null since it is not a "match".
What does anyone think?
.
Thanks for that info Scott.
Incidentally, currently WSIF only works with SOAP 2.3.1. We don't have any
plans to change this at the moment, are you saying you think we should?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44)
've missed?
...ant
Anthony Elder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Services Development
IBM UK Laboratories, Hursley Park
(+44) 01962 818320, x248320, MP208.
42 matches
Mail list logo
