+1
I need the better implementation of Utils.getOperationQName.
R J Scheuerle Jr wrote:
>Now that the interop4 branch has been merged into head, I am initiating a
>new vote to move
>explicitHeaderWork into the head.
>
>This work contains:
>* Better rpc/literal support in the emitters and ru
3.5 of the WSDL 1.1 specification,
>the third to last paragraph:
> "If use is encoded, then each message part references an abstract type using the
>type attribute."
>
>WSDL spec should be at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
>--
>Tom Jordahl
>Macromedia Server Developme
if (ns == null) {
ns = "";
}
+else {
+return new QName(ns, operationName);
+ }
to Utils.java, revision RC1
regards,
Chris Burnley
http://www.xyz.com/schema/Elements";
xmlns:types="http://www.xyz.com/schema/Types
