Re: Auto-generated test case question

2002-02-04 Thread Jean Marc Taillant
+1 - Original Message - From: Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:49 PM Subject: RE: Auto-generated test case question > > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Russell Butek [mailto:[E

RE: Auto-generated test case question

2002-02-04 Thread Glen Daniels
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Auto-generated test case question > > > There's a change I'd like to make to the auto-generated tes

RE: Auto-generated test case question

2002-02-04 Thread Tom Jordahl
+1 -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia -Original Message- From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Auto-generated test case question There's a change I'd like to make to the auto-generated test cases. Righ

Auto-generated test case question

2002-02-04 Thread Russell Butek
There's a change I'd like to make to the auto-generated test cases. Right now they call all operations from one method. The reason I'd like to change this is that if any operation fails, the test stops. I'd like to place each operation call into its own method so that all operations are called