1:36 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Matthew Duftler/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Subject: Re: Duplicate QName class
The people on the JSR 110 call yesterday decided to move javax.xml.namespace.QName out into a separate jar ... see minutes posting yesterday. So when
The people on the JSR 110 call yesterday decided to move javax.xml.namespace.QName out into a separate jar ... see minutes posting yesterday. So when the WSDL4J build.xml has changed to reflect this, WSDL4J will build wsdl4j.jar (which won't contain QName) plus another small jar not dissimilar to
Seems
to me like option 2 is the long term way to go, but I don't have any strong
feelings about it.
--
Tom
Jordahl
Macromedia
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 5:57
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sub
I know there was some recent conversation related to this issue, and I think the concensus was NOT to use the Sun implementation because of licensing constraints. In the meantime, we still have java.xml.namespace.QName defined in two places (from AXISs' perspective):
jaxrpc.jar
wsdl4j.jar
We s
