m Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/08/2003 07:35 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
bcc
Subject
RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
I agree with Dims, I don't think we want to get to far down the DLL/J
- Original Message -
From: "Jaime Meritt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 06:13
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
> Steve,
>
> +1 to the extensions directory. If this is created I wo
8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
- Original Message -
From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 21:11
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
t not in 1.1 binary distribution
- Original Message -
From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 21:11
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
> Btw, I personally think that individual Axis
- Original Message -
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 05:11
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
> My idea of Jar-Hell :( Just like DLL's/SharedObject's Hell
- Original Message -
From: "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 21:11
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
> Btw, I personally think that individual Axis transports should be put into
&
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 17:54
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
>
>
>
>
> The ideal solution would be for me as a user to simpl
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:13
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
>
> Actually, I did (JRun's), and have no idea why it wasn't in th
your
> God will be with you whereever you go.- Joshua 1:9
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 01/06/2003 05:54 PM
> Please respond to axis-dev
>
>
> To
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> bcc
>
you go.- Joshua 1:9
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 01/06/2003 05:54 PM
> Please respond to axis-dev
>
>
> To
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> bcc
>
> Subject
> RE: JMS transport not
e terrified, do not be discouraged, for the Lord your
God will be with you whereever you go.- Joshua 1:9
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/06/2003 05:54 PM
Please respond to axis-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bcc
Subject
RE:
can pick up the custom jars for
stuff like this.
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: JMS transport not in
handle the generic Ant work to set it up (I
would do that too, but I'm not too great with Ant).
Thanks,
Jaime
-Original Message-
From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 3:39 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 b
OTECTED]
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
>
>
>
>
> So out of the box Axis can't be used with any specific JMS
> implementations?
> This seems like it would impede adoption.
>
> If I have to buil
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
So out of the box Axis can't be used with any specific JMS implementations?
This seems like it would impede adoption.
If I have to build from source, does that mean using a nigh
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Kevin
Bedell/Systems/USHO/SunLife)
01/06/2003 03:25 PM
3 3:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
>
>
> Glen,
>
> Great, thanks a lot for the help. To get the SonicMQVendorAdapter to
> build you will need the SonicMQ client jars available as
> well. What is
> the curren
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
Actually, I did (JRun's), and have no idea why it wasn't in there.
I'll rebuild and repost, though, as beta2. We should get 1.1 up to
speed and out soon!
--Glen
> -Original Message-
03 2:11 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
>
>
> Jaime,
>
> The release builds are built by the release manager (in
> 1.1beta1, that was Glen) and this person has to have all of
> the jar files around to ge
Server Development
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Meritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JMS transport not in 1.1 binary distribution
Hi,
I just got an email from a user alerting me to the fact that the JMS
transport classes
Hi,
I just got an email from a user alerting me to the fact that the JMS
transport classes are not included in the binary distribution for the
Axis 1.1 beta. It is however available in the source distribution. Can
anyone shed some light on this? I would imagine that the JMS classes
were unavail
21 matches
Mail list logo
