Re: BCEL

2002-02-15 Thread R J Scheuerle Jr
The JavapUtils code is ugly. (I know because I added it.) If BCEL provides a better way to get at the debug information then we should use BCEL. A big +1 from me. Glen, please make sure the code continues to work with methods that have array parameters and return values. Thanks! Rich Scheuer

RE: BCEL

2002-02-15 Thread Tom Jordahl
+1 -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 4:34 PM To: 'Axis-Dev (E-mail)' Subject: BCEL I just revamped JavapUtils to stop using javap and start using BCEL (http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel). The main benefits

Re: BCEL

2002-02-14 Thread Russell Butek
The only objection I have you already brought up, relying on yet another jar file. I'll whine about it, but I won't whine too loudly. Go ahead. Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/14/2002 03:34:19 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Axis-Dev (E-

Re: BCEL

2002-02-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1. Even Xalan-J already uses this. Thanks, dims --- Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just revamped JavapUtils to stop using javap and start using BCEL > (http://jakarta.apache.org/bcel). The main benefits of this are speed and resource >conservation > (we no longer have to spawn