ere... All you need is a better search engine!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Rineholt/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS on 09/26/2002 09:59:10 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/MSGDispatch TestService.java
Glen,
I can't s
t there... All you need is a better search engine!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/26/2002 09:38:28 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/te
r, I
reiterate that this behavior should be crystal clear in the docs.
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 9:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/MSGDispatch
>
Glen Daniels wrote:
> In the RPC case, if you specify "*", you still shouldn't have public
> methods in your class which you don't want exported - the failure
> case here is that people can remotely call dangerous/inappropriate
> code. I'm just saying that the same idea should apply for MSG
class, and 2) a "no-superclasses" option.
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Rineholt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/MSGDispatch
> TestService.java
&
1:03 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/MSGDispatch TestService.java
We're now changing the semantics of what "allowedMethods='*'" means - for
> on 09/26/2002 08:41:03 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/MSGDispatch TestService.java
We're now changing the semantics of what "allowedMethods='*'&qu
We're now changing the semantics of what "allowedMethods='*'" means - for RPC/Doc
services, it literally means all public methods should be web methods. Now for
Message service it means "just the ones that match these signatures". I think that's
confusing. ("why is it saying 'no such method
