RE: Service interface

2002-02-05 Thread Russell Butek
also am not a fan of having 2 "Impl" files. But I don't have any really good replacement names off the top of my head. Can we change one of the other file names to be called "Interface" and drop the Impl from its corresponding concrete java class? -- Tom Jordahl -Orig

RE: Service interface

2002-02-05 Thread Russell Butek
;Impl" files. But I don't have any really good replacement names off the top of my head. Can we change one of the other file names to be called "Interface" and drop the Impl from its corresponding concrete java class? -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Russel

RE: Service interface

2002-02-05 Thread Tom Jordahl
an we change one of the other file names to be called "Interface" and drop the Impl from its corresponding concrete java class? -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

RE: Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Russell Butek
ppy. Any ideas? binding impl: Template service impl: Impl binding impl: Impl service impl: Concrete binding impl: Impl service impl: Factory Russell Butek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Sitze/Charlotte/IBM@IBMUS on 02/04/2002 09:39:46 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PRO

RE: Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Richard Sitze
/2002 09:20 Subject: RE: Service interface AM Please respond

RE: Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Russell Butek
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: Service interface Here is a suggestion: Check for "Service" at the end of the name, and don't append it if it's already there. This prevents the stupid name. Still avoids name clashes. -- Tom Jordahl -Original Message---

Re: Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Russell, Is JAX-RPC 0.7 public yet? URL? Thanks, dims --- Russell Butek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JAX-RPC 0.6 discussed generating a service interface and a service > implementation. The interface was optional. In the interests of > minimizing generated files, AXIS opted

RE: Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Tom Jordahl
February 04, 2002 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Service interface JAX-RPC 0.6 discussed generating a service interface and a service implementation. The interface was optional. In the interests of minimizing generated files, AXIS opted to NOT generate the interface. In JAX-RPC 0.7 the

Service interface

2002-02-04 Thread Russell Butek
JAX-RPC 0.6 discussed generating a service interface and a service implementation. The interface was optional. In the interests of minimizing generated files, AXIS opted to NOT generate the interface. In JAX-RPC 0.7 the service interface is no longer optional. If the service is named X, the