gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13266
RC2 not listed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Reso
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13266
RC2 not listed
Summary: RC2 not listed
Product: Axis
Version: 1.0-rc2
Platform: Other
URL: http://xml.apache.org/axis/releases.html
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity:
rdahl
com> cc:
Subject: RE: rc
Sam will have to rule with an iron-fist :)
-- dims
--- James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, what's the number of new features and build-breaking
> "enhancements" targeted for this release candidate?
>
>
> Seriously... after the whirlwind that occurred over the past few week
So, what's the number of new features and build-breaking
"enhancements" targeted for this release candidate?
Seriously... after the whirlwind that occurred over the past few weeks, is
this code really going to remain stable until the 1.0 release?
- James Snell
IBM Emerging Technolo
chard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09/30/2002 09:00 AM
Please respond to axis-dev
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: rc2 status
I am in agr
+1 on your proposal, Tom.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/30/2002 09:00:53 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: rc2 status
I am in agreemen
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> com> cc:
>
>
>Subject: RE: rc2 status
&g
cc:
Subject: RE: rc2 status
09/30/2002 09:00
: Re: rc2 status
I would really like to stop this Friday, so I agree with Sam. If you
notice, I've been silent on a number of the votes because I don't think we
need them for 1.0. I haven't gone so far as to veto anything, but I've
also noticed that some things didn'
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obvi
Thanks
j
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sitze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rc2 status
+1 to releasing ALL changes todate. I've requested votes for a few, with
no -1 (but no real +1's either)... I
to axis-dev
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentime
Unfortunately, most of the recent ones have, IMHO, been in that category. :/
--G
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:27 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rc2 status
>
>
> Richar
TECTED]
cc
bcc
Subject
Re: rc2 status
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obviously wrong with that change so it should be
Richard Sitze wrote:
> +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point. I
really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
obviously wrong with that change so it should be included" to "I really
think that we w
+1 to releasing ALL changes todate. I've requested votes for a few, with
no -1 (but no real +1's either)... I'd like to pull these in.
ALSO, I'd like a window to work on some documentation... let's cut an RC2
with what we've got, give users time to play with
The plan is to continue rolling in changes that have been voted on into the 1.0
branch, so the 1.0 final release will likely still have a few more fixes/changes after
rc2.
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: David Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September
What happens next? Is rc2 it? Is there a potential for a rc3 next
week, or does this one smell like its the one?
The reason I am asking is I would like to write up some doc on how to
use the JMS transport and its sample. If I had that by COB Monday would
that still be possible to get in
BMUScc:
Subject: Re: rc2 status
09/27/2002 0
While I don't like shipping a rc that does not pass our own tests, I will
do so this evening if there is no fix to the security problem. I'll
include any of the fixes which have been voted on at the time I cut the
release.
Meanwhile, I am on dalnet, but can't seem to get into undernet.
- Sa
I uploaded rc2 to http://xml.apache.org/axis/dist/1_0rc2/ yesterday, but
did not announce it as I was having troubles verifying that the security
tests pass. You see, I've been trying to debug for the past 24+ hours
or so why I could not get the security tests to pass with released
ver
+1 to both 1.0 branch and rc2.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] incorporate the following fixes in to the 1_0 branch and
into rc2
+1 for both, these fixes are all good.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] incorporate the following fixes in to the 1_0
> branch and
> into rc
+1 (Latest HEAD into 1_0)
+1 (Latest HEAD into rc2)
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Index: java/README
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-axis/java/README,v
> retrieving revision 1.12.4.1
>
+1
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
> The goal of the rc2 release is simply to package up all of the fixes
> made since the rc1 release in a form convenient and conducive for a
> wider audience to test and provide feedback on. As such, there are no
> list of "must f
ormington"
cc:
Subject: RE: [vote] Release plan for a
1
r a
1.0 rc2 release
23/09/02 15:07
Please respond
+1
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vote] Release plan for a 1.0 rc2 release
The goal of the rc2 release is simply to package up all of
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 12:04 AM
Subject: [vote] Release plan for a 1.0 rc2 release
> The goal of the rc2 release is simply to package up all of the fixes
> mad
+1.
Thanks,
dims
--- Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The goal of the rc2 release is simply to package up all of the fixes
> made since the rc1 release in a form convenient and conducive for a
> wider audience to test and provide feedback on. As such, there are no
>
+1
I would like to se my build changes go out as part of the official 1.0
release, so an RC2 which contains them is preferrable to me
Matt Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBMExternal:(512) 838-3656 Internal: 678-3656
The goal of the rc2 release is simply to package up all of the fixes
made since the rc1 release in a form convenient and conducive for a
wider audience to test and provide feedback on. As such, there are no
list of "must fix bugs" for this particular release.
The plan is to cut a
With this class org.apache.soap.messaging.Message, we have the following
method send(java.net.URL url, java.lang.String actionURI,
Envelope env) and addBodyPart javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPart part)
But with the class org.apache.axis.Message, this methods doesn't exist.
How to do th
i originally posted this on the user list, but thought that it might be
better fit in the dev list since i'm asking about a particular line of code
and what it could (possibly) be doing wrong. thanks.
this question applies to beta1 rc2.
when i try to generate the WSDL from the ?wsdl
Actually my deployment file looks like this:
http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/";
xmlns:java="http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/providers/java";>
but when invoking the service (follows SOAP Message)
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://ww
36 matches
Mail list logo
