Glen,
Has there been any discussion about soap:header support in last week's chat?
Sylvain.
-Original Message-
From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:28 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: soap:header new implementation
Hi
ECTED]'
Subject: RE: soap:header new implementation
Hi Sylvain!
First off, I'm psyched that you're moving in this direction, because we
clearly need to support headers in some way.The following is my take on
things, both in terms of where I'd like to be able to go wrt extensions i
lement, DISCARD/PERSIST flag]) in the Stub to make
this happen.
Thoughts?
A few more specific comments re: your message inline below.
Thanks,
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: St-Germain, Sylvain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:44 AM
> To: A
Read on - design issue at the end.
I have modified the original soap:header support implementation to allow
full flexibility around the header management. The way I have achieve this
is by allowing the user to specify the header object lifecycle. The current
three lifecycles are:
HeaderLifeCy
