Re: [axis2] ServiceClient.disEngageModule question.

2006-04-17 Thread Deepal Jayasinghe
Hi David; If you engage a module globally you have to dis-engage the module globally. The solution to your problem is , rather than engaging addressing globally engage and dis-engage addressing service level. I have tested module dis-engagement and it works perfectly :) David Illsley wrote:

Re: [axis2] ServiceClient.disEngageModule question.

2006-04-12 Thread David Illsley
Hi Eran, thanks for the reply. It does however leave me a little confused about what ServiceClient.disEngageModule is supposed to do if not dynamically disengage a module? ;-) Thanks, David Eran Chinthaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/04/2006 17:34:12: Hi David, Firstly, Axis2 doesn't

Re: [axis2] ServiceClient.disEngageModule question.

2006-04-11 Thread Eran Chinthaka
Hi David, Firstly, Axis2 doesn't support dynamic module dis-engagement, just like we do not support hot deployment of modules. This is not a bug and it is by design. Secondly, once a module is engaged globally, it can not be dis-engaged per service/operation basis. But for addressing, we have

[axis2] ServiceClient.disEngageModule question.

2006-04-10 Thread David Illsley
Hi, I have an axis2.xml setup to enable the addressing module globally which is being picked up in my client code. I want to disable the addressing module in the client for some calls and thought that calling MyStub._getServiceClient().disEngageModule(new QName(addressing)); would do this however

Re: [axis2] ServiceClient.disEngageModule question.

2006-04-10 Thread David Illsley
Apologies for the HTML mail, with any luck this one isn't! David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/04/2006 17:15:02: Hi, I have an axis2.xml setup to enable the addressing module globally which is being picked up in my client code. I want to disable the addressing module in the client for