Bad namespaces in serialized beans in doc/literal (wrapped)

2006-06-07 Thread Per Salomonsson \(KA/EAB\)
There have been several issues reported which describes the same problem - missing namespaces when using document/literal (wrapped) and complex types. It seems like the namespaces on complex types are ignored when serializing, causing problems because the SOAP message does not match the XML schema

Why does doc/literal wrapped require creating typemapping

2006-03-16 Thread Mark Andersen
Axis version = axis 1.3 Why do I get a bunch of warnings saying I need to register a typemapping when I run Java2WSDL for a Doc/lit/wrapped style webservice but not when I run Java2WSDL for an RPC style webservice?   And the warnings are for exceptions.    Ant commands being run.  

RE: Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Griffin, Mark
-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 6:59 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Doc/literal Wrapped In the wrapped convention, the message input element local name must be the same as the operation name

Re: Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
pse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input message should be the same.markg-Original Message-From: Griffin, MarkSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:36 AMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.org

RE: Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Griffin, Mark
Griffin, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A follow-up to this.  Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstandin

Re: Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
> wrote: A follow-up to this.  Changing the Operation name to something otherthan the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not beinggenerated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. Myunderstanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the in

RE: Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Griffin, Mark
A follow-up to this. Changing the Operation name to something other than the Input message name fixes the problem of the beans not being generated in Eclipse. I don't think this is the way it should work. My understanding of Doc/literal wrapped is that the operation name and the input me

Doc/literal Wrapped

2006-02-21 Thread Griffin, Mark
Has anyone run into issues with doc/literal wrapped using Eclipse 3.1 with the new WTP 1.0 toolset. It uses Axis which supports doc/literal wrapped but for some reason it doesn't seem to work within the tool. It works fine from the command line using Axis 1.3. Basically its not generatin

Re: Question about xsd:anyType arrays in doc/literal wrapped mode

2005-06-16 Thread Mario Felarca
Thank you very much for the clarification Anne! --- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An instance of an array may contain only one type, > even if you define > that type as anyType. > > Anne > > On 6/15/05, Mario Felarca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > First I wou

Re: Question about xsd:anyType arrays in doc/literal wrapped mode

2005-06-16 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
An instance of an array may contain only one type, even if you define that type as anyType. Anne On 6/15/05, Mario Felarca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > First I would like to say thank you to everyone that > has contributed to this list. While I have lurked and > been helped a lot by i

Question about xsd:anyType arrays in doc/literal wrapped mode

2005-06-15 Thread Mario Felarca
Hello, First I would like to say thank you to everyone that has contributed to this list. While I have lurked and been helped a lot by information here, I have not had a chance up until now to say thanks, so, thanks. :) My question has to deal with arrays. I have looked over the archives, and a l