Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields

2006-06-04 Thread Daniel Destro
: Daniel Destro To: axis-user@ws.apache.org ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:50 PM Subject: Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields This sounds stupid.Thanks On 6/2/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please hand edit the wsdl after you

Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields

2006-06-03 Thread Martin Gainty
- From: Daniel Destro To: axis-user@ws.apache.org ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 3:50 PM Subject: Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields This sounds stupid.Thanks On 6/2/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please hand edit the wsdl

Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields

2006-06-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Please hand edit the wsdl after you generate it. thanks, dims On 6/1/06, Daniel Destro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Since I started using LITERAL style to generate my WSDL and then Skeleton classes, I can not use nillable fields. Instead of Long, Integer (classes) I get long and integer

Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields

2006-06-02 Thread Daniel Destro
This sounds stupid.ThanksOn 6/2/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please hand edit the wsdl after you generate it.thanks,dimsOn 6/1/06, Daniel Destro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Since I started using LITERAL style to generate my WSDL and then Skeleton classes, I can not use

WSDL-First (Re: SOAP Literal style and nillable fields)

2006-06-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
When you use java2wsdl it's a best efforts atab at trying to create something that you can start with. So once you have that, you can tweak it to you hearts content and check it into your source repo. From then on you need to start from the tweaked wsdl. thanks, dims On 6/2/06, Daniel Destro