O(n) scouring of that
document...does WSDL 2.0 support operator overloading?
-dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D.Kreft
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:40 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Support for
TECTED]
Subject: Re: Support for polymorphism in a service
But wasn't the notion of portType supposed to be nixed in WSDL 1.1?
-dan
On 10/11/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please see:
>
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html#Distinctive_O
But wasn't the notion of portType supposed to be nixed in WSDL 1.1?
-dan
On 10/11/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please see:
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html#Distinctive_Operations
thanks,
-- dims
On 10/11/06, D. Kreft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Please see:
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html#Distinctive_Operations
thanks,
-- dims
On 10/11/06, D. Kreft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm writing a service that I'm trying to integrate into a legacy
system bit by bit. In the old system, a "request ID" is a String of
I'm writing a service that I'm trying to integrate into a legacy
system bit by bit. In the old system, a "request ID" is a String of
the format "rqMMDDHHMMSSXXX", but in the new system, a request ID
is simply a row identifier (a Long).
What I'd like to do is use the power of polymorphism to k
