I assume that MXPERSONTinterface is defined in the imported schema.
From what I see, the WSDL is WS-I BP 1.1 compliant. My assumption is
that the .NET validator has a bug.
Anne
On 4/3/07, Rishi krish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Anne
I am attaching the wsdl and the conformance report as well
.NET can consume an unwrapped doc/literal service, but it's less
convenient for the .NET developer. As a general rule, I recommend that
you always follow the wrapped convention.
I'm having trouble understanding where the BP 1.1 validator is
failing. Could you show us the WSDL (or a similar repres
Hi Anne
Thanks again for your clarification on .Net requirements. You said doc-Lit
wrapped is the *default* format generated by .Net. Do you imply that if my
axis service is not conforming to doc-lit wrapped format .Net cannot
communicate to it? OR .Net can be configured to communicate with a serv
One more thing ...
The wrapped convention also requires that the response element be
defined as a complexType with a sequence, e.g.,
If you have an empty message, then you aren't following the wrapped
convention. The wrapped convention requires that the input message
contain an element whose lo
If you have an empty message, then you aren't following the wrapped
convention. The wrapped convention requires that the input message
contain an element whose local name is the same as the operation, and
the output message contain an element whose local name is the
operation appended with "Respon
Hi Anne
thanks for the clarification. I am wondering if what you said for RPC type
is also valid for the wrapped doc-lit type too [which kind of similar to rpc
literal type and which is followed by .Net]. I mean if a pojo service method
signature reads --
public void test(String s)
The response
It depends on the style.
If you are using document style, an empty message declaration with no
parts (either input or output) will generate an empty SOAP body.
If you are using rpc style, an empty input message declaration will
generate a SOAP body containing an element that has a local name equ
Also just wanted to show what the TCP monitor is howing for the response
http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsi="
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
So the body elemet is empty and the wsdl snippet is below:
Hi Amila
I am sorry for confusing the qustion.
I am WSDL is using soap binding with http as the transport protocol. In my
secnario the WSDL operation has both intput and output message and the
output message has no part associated with it. My question was should the
service response contain an emp
On 3/29/07, Rishi krish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All
This is probably a generic wsdl question - I will be using a the Axis2
serviceclient api to call a web service which has a wsdl operation [with
http binding] the outpout of which refers to a wsdl:message which has no
parts defined. I am w
Hi All
This is probably a generic wsdl question - I will be using a the Axis2
serviceclient api to call a web service which has a wsdl operation [with
http binding] the outpout of which refers to a wsdl:message which has no
parts defined. I am wondering what that means for the service response?
A>
11 matches
Mail list logo
