- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 14:13
Subject: RE: standalone vs. servlet
> I suspect that the use of reflection has a lot to do with the issue. Java
> platforms use reflection to enable a bunch of
- Original Message -
From: "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:46
Subject: RE: standalone vs. servlet
> Dennis,
>
> I absolutely agree with you regarding application code. Using
well-optimized
> code and a good application se
You both bring interesting points to light. I certainly get Anne's
"machine efficiency vs. programmer efficiency" argument. I've managed
to got lots done in Perl, Tcl and Javascript, so I'm biased against
on-the-metal system programming languages. Java seems wonderfully
expressive, but my con
Title: Does Axis 1.1 Beta support custom faults?
Java2Wsdl and Wsdl2Java seem to support custom faults. But when I throw such a fault on the server-side, I get an AxisFault on the client.
Naresh
Title: Accessing a service via SOAP as well as Java
Hello!
I have setup Axis with JBoss 3.0/Tomcat 4.1.12 and
have a very Happy Happiness Page,
however every request to a .jws file fails with the
below exception, can someone
tell me what went wrong?
15:36:55,302 ERROR [AxisServlet]
Except
I suspect that the use of reflection has a lot to do with the issue. Java
platforms use reflection to enable a bunch of dynamic features which are
really hard to reproduce in a C++ environment. You'll find this to be true
in SOAP platforms, servlet engines, and J2EE servers. It's a trade-off
betwee
I think this is an artificial distinction, Anne. I'd suspect the
difference in performance of your SOAP platforms is due more to how
they're structured internally rather than to any inherent differences in
C++ vs Java. For instance, Java SOAP implementations commonly use
reflection to access da
Dennis,
I absolutely agree with you regarding application code. Using well-optimized
code and a good application server, you ought to be able to make a Java
application run at a speed that's reasonably comparable to a C++
application. There's a bigger difference, though, when it comes to
infrastru
Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
There's no doubt that a C++ environment will offer higher performance than a
Java environment. Ask Systinet. WASP for C++ is a *lot* faster than WASP for
Java. The two environments use basically the same architecture, but C is
just faster than Java. Even so I suspect that
A servlet container is a container within an application server that can
host Java servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSPs). All J2EE application
services include a servlet container. They also include an EJB container.
There are a number of application servers that provide a servlet container,
but not
Anne,
Thanks for your response. As you probably suspected, when I said
"native", I meant something written in C, C++ or some other language
that gets compiled to machine code. Things of that nature are obviously
faster, so I guess my question really boiled down to: what are the
advantages of
Title: Accessing a service via SOAP as well as Java
I have exposed a service via SOAP. However, I also need to access this service internally from my application. Do you think it is okay to access the service directly by calling its SOAP implementation (bypassing the Axis servlet completely)?
12 matches
Mail list logo
