customize soap faults in axis 1.1

2005-01-01 Thread Peter Gerstbach
Hi, I want to publish a java method as an axis-1.1 webservice, which throws an exception. The exception should be mapped as a soap-fault. So far so good. But is it possible to customize the elements inside the soapenv:Fault element? The current response (in case of the exception) is like this:

Re: Axis and applets Not SPAM.

2005-01-01 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Jay and Jay, IF you really want to help othersIf you see a bug, log a bug report. If you can, please submit a patch too then it will get fixed faster. FYI, we are very close to 1.2 Final, so any help in fixing issues like these is appreciated. thanks, dims On Sat, 1 Jan 2005 13:14:07 -0500,

Axis and applets Not SPAM.

2005-01-01 Thread Jay Doggett
Jay,       Thanks. The architectural decision to use Axis was not mine to make. That being said, Axis being a web based client server technology, it should have been made to work in an applet -first- IMO.       Having any web app client -required- to download libraries is extremely poor desi

RE: Spam:RE: Axis and applets classpath answer and next problem.

2005-01-01 Thread Baker, Jay
In my experience, I found that it was necessary to circumvent the sandbox restrictions when using axis from an applet. That means signing the requisite jars ar least. I also set my own security manager for convenience sake.   Again, based on my experience, and depending on what one wants an

RE: Is Axis generating bad WSDL, or is .NET's wsdl.exe broken?

2005-01-01 Thread Donnie Hale
Simon, I appreciate the response. If you know, how do I get Axis to not insert that prefix when it auto-generates the WSDL? Is it a bug, and should I submit a new bug entry? Or is there a deployment/configuration mechanism that will prevent this? Thanks again, Donnie -Original Message

RE: Is Axis generating bad WSDL, or is .NET's wsdl.exe broken?

2005-01-01 Thread Donnie Hale
Simon, I appreciate the response. If you know, how do I get Axis to not insert that prefix when it auto-generates the WSDL? Is it a bug, and should I submit a new bug entry? Or is there a deployment/configuration mechanism that will prevent this? Thanks again, Donnie -Original Message