k to the ClassLoader that loaded them when
looking to load new classes, so what you're asking should (modulo any other
particular details you're not mentioning) work just fine.
Ted Neward
http://www.neward.net/ted/weblog
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
ained
approach and return the complete collection across the wire all at once, or
else in large "chunks" so that you're not making a network call for each
element.
Remember, Web services != CORBA or RMI all over again, despite what you're
hearing from the vendors and hype channe
quires you to learn and understand the nuances of XML Schema, which
are somewhat nontrivial.
That said, though, I think ultimately it's the best approach to take, in
order to maximize the interoperability of your web service, which (if
you think about it) is really the whole point in the fi
airly soon.
But to answer the question you asked, Dennis, yes, at least for .NET 1.0,
DIME is the approved method of doing attachments in SOAP. .NET 1.1 is in
beta as we speak, can't speak to that, but I think the answer's still the
same.
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financia
There
is no convenient mapping for Unicode characters in Schema; the closest we could
come to is either an xsd:string, or an xsd:sequence minOccurs="2" maxOccurs="2"
of xsd:byte (which is trey ugly).
Anybody know if Schema v1.1 provides this?
Ted NewardArchitect, UCDavis Account & Financ
tools aren't being given
information on how to do so. :-)
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ewing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 14:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
larger question is whether
WSDL/XSD tools can handle it. :-)
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
-Original Message-
From: Cun Yong Tan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:50
To: [EMAIL PROTE
things in XML themselves. If
you want to go back and suggest IDL again, I'm sure the W3C will happily
receive your submission ;-)
One thought which *does* perhaps offer some attraction is an IDL->WSDL tool,
though
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://
Uh It's not having any problems either on my system here or on my
laptop
(Sun *really* needs to revisit this whole ClassLoader thing. This just keeps
getting worse and worse.)
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clr
It's usually far clearner to put all necessary .jar files into
the webapp/WEB-INF/lib directory, so as not to conflict when JAXRPC (or JAXM, or
JAXP, or JAXB, or any other .jar file) versions and you need to change it.
Otherwise you WILL get burned if you have two webapps (two different ortho
ng with .NET ?
>
.NET most certainly can handle multidimensional arrays--it supports both.
In general, you're probably better off building the complex type "by hand":
For best results with respect to interoperability, write your WSDL first.
Ted New
few years (2 or 3) for us as an industry to figure out all the warts,
so expect some backtracking and revisiting. Much of that is already going on
with SOAP 1.2 and WSDL 1.2 already, but SOAP 1.2 *just* came out, and WSDL
1.2 is still very much on the drawing board. And even then, that doesn'
ion is
the overhead of tying "request" and "response" together--identifying that
*this* response goes with *that* request five minutes ago, and so on. (JMS
has some headers they reserve for precisely this purpose.)
Ted Neward
{.NET || Java} Course Author & Instructor, Deve
I
believe the problem there (in the Beans spec) was what to do about "holes"
caused by the set-by-index operation:
bean.setArray(new Object[3] { ..., ..., ... });
bean.setArray(12, new Object()); // Do we grow to 12 and leave 8 holes of
null Object refs?
That
said, do you have to be 100%
whole, which may not flow down to the individual
webapps--this is an area I'm not familiar with, so I'm just hypothesizing
here. Caveat emptor.
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
-Original Message-
Fr
Does
anybody know of a freeware WSDL validation service? Seems like this (that is, an
invalid well-formed WSDL doc) could come up a lot.
Ted NewardArchitect, UCDavis Account & Financial
Serviceshttp://www.javageeks.comhttp://www.clrgeeks.com
-Original Message-From: Cohan, Sean
Bear in mind, too, that Rotor/Linux implementations are *just* coming out,
so it may require a bit of time to settle those out, too.
Rotor does include .NET remoting, both SOAP and binary formatted, but
definitely does not include ASP.NET.
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Finan
Axis, and if
so, can they send me what they've got?
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 01:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Does anybody have a functioning WSDL-to-Java example that uses doc/literal
rules they can send me? I'd like to have a baseline against which to verify
what I'm doing.
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
erstanding, then why isn't it?
:-)
(I can ship the project--.jar file of both client and server--if somebody
wants to verify.)
Ted Neward
Architect, UCDavis Account & Financial Services
http://www.javageeks.com
http://www.clrgeeks.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
