RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Jordahl
Make sure to use a recent build for any and all Fault testing. --- Tom Jordahl -Original Message- From: Steve Loughran [mailto:steve_l@;iseran.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping - Original

Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-13 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 7:41 AM Subject: RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping Steve, >Sorry if my message sounded negative to you in any way. >I did not mean to do it. That

RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-13 Thread Ruslan . Zenin
ntion this (in more detail) in my previous message in this thread. Thanks anyway for the suggestion, regards, Ruslan Zenin http://www.geocities.com/russ_zenin -Original Message- From: sgollery Sent: November 12, 2002 8:27 PM To: sgollery; axis-user Subject: Re: (Chained) Exceptions and b

RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-13 Thread Tom Jordahl
, 2002 10:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping Steve, Sorry if my message sounded negative to you in any way. I did not mean to do it. I'm fully aware that Web Services are designed for interoperation among different platforms and languages. However, JA

RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-13 Thread Ruslan . Zenin
/www.geocities.com/russ_zenin -Original Message- From: steve.l Sent: November 12, 2002 7:11 PM To: steve.l; axis-user Subject: Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping - Original Message - From: Ruslan Zenin To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:42 PM Subj

Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-12 Thread Steven Gollery
xis-user Subject: Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping Exceptions are special, as they go back over the wire as soapfaults, the intent being better interop. 1. look at what the JAX-RPC spec has to say 2. look at AxisFault and how exceptions are handled. You will probably have to s

Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-12 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping >Can anyone explain clearly WHY developers are forced >to inherit from AxisFault class? >It is a huge

RE: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-12 Thread Ruslan . Zenin
.com/russ_zenin -Original Message- From: steve.l Sent: November 12, 2002 4:09 PM To: steve.l; axis-user Subject: Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping Exceptions are special, as they go back over the wire as soapfaults, the intent being better interop. 1. look at what the JAX-RPC sp

Re: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-12 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Hicks, SJC (Steve) " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:35 AM Subject: (Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping > > I've created a custom exception in WSDL with some extra fields in it, >

(Chained) Exceptions and beanMapping

2002-11-12 Thread Hicks, SJC (Steve)
I've created a custom exception in WSDL with some extra fields in it, generated the Java and deployed it all successfully (including setting up a beanMapping), but the extra fields don't seem to be serialized and deserialized to XML. The generated exception class has all the right constructors an