PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
Whatever visibility class B has of A will go to whatever class is using
B. The protected nature of the A constructor is not an issue for C, if C
has public acce
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Cory Wilkerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
Do you need to enforce/have to have that protected default
constructor? I'm getting by
sage-
From: Cory Wilkerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
Do you need to enforce/have to have that protected default constructor? I'm getting
by just fine with base c
PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 'Almeida, Timothy'
Subject: RE: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
I apologize a bit since my example doesn't show this. The methods of the base class
are public so can't they basically be thought of as being part of su
public class B
extends A
{
public B()
{
super();
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Almeida, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 5:12 PM
To: Scott Leschke
Subject: RE: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
Doesn't surprise me very mu
I haven't seen any response to this so I'll try one more time.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Leschke Scott-QA2775
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 10:03 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Base Classes and java.lang.IllegalAccessException
We're using
We're using Axis 1.0 and are having a problem with serialization using BeanSerializer.
We have a number of classes that are public and have public default constructors but
they extend abstract classes that have package level visibility. For example:
abstract class A
{
protected A()
{}
}
