ny volunteers?
>
> Anne
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark Galbreath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:43 AM
> Subject: RE: Best practices question
>
>
> >
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Best practices question
Many of the commercial Java implementations (WASP, GLUE, Cape Clear, XMLBus)
autogenerate the schema, WSDL, and UDDI documents for you also. There'
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: Best practices question
> What really needs to happen is the availability of tools that
auto-generate
> the XML schema, WSDL, and UDDI documents so developers don'
What really needs to happen is the availability of tools that auto-generate
the XML schema, WSDL, and UDDI documents so developers don't have to waste
time learning and implementing a technology that does not return benefit
relative to amount of effort. These documents are tedious to produce at
be
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Best practices question
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> <<
> It does seem to complicate the 'set up' of the call from the client
side
> when you use doc/literal. Doesn't the client have to manually
construct
> the
> XML message to be p
Message-
From: Stu Halloway (DevelopMentor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Best practices question
Hi Jim,
<<
It does seem to complicate the 'set up' of the call from the client side
when you use doc/literal. Do
Hi Jim,
<<
It does seem to complicate the 'set up' of the call from the client side
when you use doc/literal. Doesn't the client have to manually construct
the
XML message to be passed to the server in the case of a doc/literal
service
call (when the xsd types required by the doc/literal service
