Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Dennis Sosnoski wrote: It's actually easy to represent this in schema, as: Whoops, this should instead be: You don't need (and can't use) an inner complexType element, but in more complex cases can just nest the sequence

Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
MAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects Anne, I think you're conflating the programming model and the data model here. I know you're doing it in the interest of keeping things simple,

RE: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
D] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects Anne, I think you're conflating the programming model and the data model here. I know you're doing it in the interest of keeping things simple, but

RE: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
D] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects Anne, I think you're conflating the programming model and the data model here. I know you're doing it in the interest of keeping things simple, but

Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Vinay Punnoose
You can even try Custom serializers and deserializers to convert the HashMap into XML, and then the client side of the service can use it in whatever way it finds it useful. On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:07:25 +1000, Mark Chaimungkalanont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm writing a SOAP s

Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-11-02 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
k Chaimungkalanont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects I'm quite new to SOAP so I'm not entirely sure what "design WSDL contract" actually entails. Are there an

RE: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-10-31 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
l map to JavaBeans. They will map to comparable components in other languages. Anne -Original Message- From: Mark Chaimungkalanont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects I

RE: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-10-31 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
l map to JavaBeans. They will map to comparable components in other languages. Anne -Original Message- From: Mark Chaimungkalanont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 5:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects I

Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-10-31 Thread Mark Chaimungkalanont
I'm quite new to SOAP so I'm not entirely sure what "design WSDL contract" actually entails. Are there any resources out there that you would recommend? I've got a few google hits, but figure that people on this list probably have their "favourite" resources. Is there a collection of such resou

Re: Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-10-29 Thread Egor Pervuninski
Hello, ## Mark Chaimungkalanont : Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:07:25 +1000 MC> Hi there, I'm writing a SOAP service where interoperability is of MC> utmost importance. I've read a few of the other posts on this, and MC> people seem to be saying that Hashtables and the like are not MC> interoperable. The

Maximum Interoperability with "Map" objects

2004-10-29 Thread Mark Chaimungkalanont
Hi there, I'm writing a SOAP service where interoperability is of utmost importance. I've read a few of the other posts on this, and people seem to be saying that Hashtables and the like are not interoperable. The best strategy seems to be writing a basic "Entry" bean with key value pairs, usin