Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
g would be an overhead for RPC styled web service due to(un)marshalling of parameters? Thanks a ton, Vivek From: Jim Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:44:30 -0500 Vivek Nagu

Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Jim Murphy
Vivek Nagulapati wrote: Hello Jim, Thanks for explaining some of the issues which were totally esoteric to me. Off late, I have been into lot of tutorials and low-level details which forced me to develop this notion. Can you please clarify me on the following issue. My pleasure - as much as I

Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
In addition to payload size, you should also measure payload complexity. It's a lot easier and faster to transform a single 10MB string than it is to transform a 10K array containing 100 complex structures. But I have to ask why you're planning to compare the two. The performance difference sho

Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Vivek Nagulapati
TECTED] Subject: Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:44:30 -0500 Vivek Nagulapati wrote: > MS web services are document-styled web services. But you still have > >the overhead of (de)serializing your XML request to parameters. > When you have a service which

Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Jim Murphy
Vivek Nagulapati wrote: > MS web services are document-styled web services. But you still have > >the overhead of (de)serializing your XML request to parameters. > When you have a service which takes 5 parameters as input, you would >have to deal with the (de)serializing/mapping of the XML to 5

RE: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Vivek Nagulapati
27;" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Document (Vs) RPC style services Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:20:37 -0500 I was looking into interoperability with MS web services and discovered that MS supports doc, but not RPC. However, it appears that RPC is a subset of doc, so it is possible to

Re: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Jim Murphy
Don't mind if I firm up this post a bit for the archives... Pridemore, Russell (MAN-Corporate) wrote: I was looking into interoperability with MS web services and discovered that MS supports doc, but not RPC. However, it appears that RPC is a subset of doc, so it is possible to convert a WSDL fr

RE: Document (Vs) RPC style services

2004-03-30 Thread Pridemore, Russell (MAN-Corporate)
I was looking into interoperability with MS web services and discovered that MS supports doc, but not RPC. However, it appears that RPC is a subset of doc, so it is possible to convert a WSDL from RPC -> document. Anyway, the point is that there shouldn't be any measurable difference between the